Background: Pit and fissure sealants (sealants) are widely used as a non-operative preventive
method in public dental health in Finland. Most children under 19 years of age attend the
community-organized dental health services free of charge. The aims of this study were to find out
to what extent sealants were applied, what the attitudes of dental professionals towards sealant
application were, and whether any existing sealant policies could be detected among the health
centres or among the respondents in general. The study evaluated changes that had taken place in
the policies used during a ten year period (1991–2001).
Methods: A questionnaire was mailed to each chief dental officer (CDO) of the 265 public dental
health centres in Finland, and to a group of general dentists (GDP) applying sealants in these health
centres, giving a total of 434 questionnaires with 22 questions. The response rate was 80% (N =
342).
Results: A majority of the respondents reported to application of sealants on a systematic basis
for children with increased caries risk. The criteria for applying sealants and the actual strategies
seemed to vary locally between the dentists within the health centres and between the health
centres nationwide. The majority of respondents believed sealants had short- and long-term
effects. The overall use of sealants decreased towards the end of the ten year period. The health
centres (N = 28) choosing criteria to seal over detected or suspected enamel caries lesion had a
DMFT value of 1.0 (SD ± 0.49) at age 12 (year 2000) compared to a value of 1.2 (SD ± 0.47) for
those health centres (N = 177) applying sealants by alternative criteria (t-test, p < 0.05).
Conclusion: There seems to be a need for defined guidelines for sealant application criteria and
policy both locally and nationwide. Occlusal caries management may be improved by shifting the
sealant policy from the traditional approach of prevention to interception, i.e. applying the sealants
over detected or suspected enamel caries lesions instead of sealing sound teeth.
Since 2002, adults have been able to choose oral health care services in the public sector or in the private sector in Finland. Though various subsidies for care exist in both sectors, the Public Dental Service (PDS) is a cheaper option for the patient but, on the other hand, there are no waiting lists for private care. The aim of this study was to assess middle-aged adults' use of dental services, willingness to pay (WTP) and ability to pay (ATP) for unexpected, urgent dental treatment.
Postal questionnaires on use of dental services were sent to a random sample of 1500 47-59 year old adults living in three large municipalities in the Helsinki region. The initial response rate was 65.8%. Two hypothetical scenarios were presented: "What would be the highest price you would be prepared to pay to have a lost filling replaced immediately, or, at the latest, the day after losing the filling?" and " How much could you pay for unexpected dental expenses at two weeks notice, if you suddenly needed more comprehensive treatment?" Logistic regression analysis was used to analyse factors related to WTP and ATP.
Most respondents (89.6%) had visited a dentist recently and a majority (76.1%) had used private services. For immediate replacement of a lost filling, almost all respondents (93.2%) were willing to pay the lower price charged in the PDS and 46.2% were willing to pay the private fee. High income and no subjective need for dental treatment were positively associated with the probability of paying a higher price. Most respondents (93.0%) were able to pay a low fee, EUR 50 and almost half (41.6%) at least EUR 300 for unexpected treatment at short notice. High income and male sex were associated with high ATP.
There was a strong and statistically significant relationship between income and WTP and ATP for urgent dental care, indicating that access to publicly provided services improved equity for persons with low income.