Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBarfoed, Benedicte Lind
dc.contributor.authorPaulsen, Maja Skov
dc.contributor.authorChristensen, Palle Mark
dc.contributor.authorHalvorsen, Peder Andreas
dc.contributor.authorKjær, Trine
dc.contributor.authorLarsen, Mogens Lytken
dc.contributor.authorLarsen, Pia Veldt
dc.contributor.authorNielsen, Jesper Bo
dc.contributor.authorSøndergaard, Jens
dc.contributor.authorJarbøl, Dorte Ejg
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-02T12:14:41Z
dc.date.available2017-01-02T12:14:41Z
dc.date.issued2016-09-03
dc.description.abstract<b>Background:</b> Poor adherence to medical treatment may have considerable consequences for the patients’ health and for healthcare costs to society. The need to understand the determinants for poor adherence has motivated several studies on socio-demographics and comorbidity. Few studies focus on the association between risk attitude and adherence. The aim of the present study was to estimate associations between patients’ adherence to statin treatment and different dimensions of risk attitude, and to identify subgroups of patients with poor adherence.<br> Methods: Population-based questionnaire and register-based study on a sample of 6393 persons of the general. Danish population aged 20–79. Data on risk attitude were based on 4 items uncovering health-related as well as financial dimensions of risk attitude. They were collected through a web-based questionnaire and combined with register data on redeemed statin prescriptions, sociodemographics and comorbidity. Adherence was estimated by proportion of days covered using a cut-off point at 80 %.<br> <b>Results:</b> For the dimension of health-related risk attitude, “Preference for GP visit when having symptoms”, riskneutral and risk-seeking patients had poorer adherence than the risk-averse patients, OR 0.80 (95 %-CI 0.68–0.95)and OR 0.83 (95 %-CI 0.71–0.98), respectively. No significant association was found between adherence and financial risk attitude. Further, patients in the youngest age group and patients with no CVD were less adherent to statin treatment. <br> <b>Conclusion:</b> We find some indication that risk attitude is associated with adherence to statin treatment, and that risk-neutral and risk-seeking patients may have poorer adherence than risk-averse patients. This is important for clinicians to consider when discussing optimal treatment decisions with their patients. The identified subgroups with the poorest adherence may deserve special attention from their GP regarding statin treatment.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBMC Family Practice 2016, 17(1)en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 1346113
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12875-016-0423-1
dc.identifier.issn1471-2296
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/10062
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-uit_munin_9228
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Clinical medical disciplines: 750::Family practice: 751en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Klinisk medisinske fag: 750::Allmennmedisin: 751en_US
dc.subjectCardiovascularen_US
dc.subjectStatinsen_US
dc.subjectRisk attitudeen_US
dc.subjectAdherenceen_US
dc.subjectGeneral practiceen_US
dc.titleAssociations between patients’ risk attitude and their adherence to statin treatment – a population based questionnaire and register studyen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US


File(s) in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record