Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKundzina, Rita
dc.contributor.authorStangvaltaite, Lina
dc.contributor.authorEriksen, Harald
dc.contributor.authorKerosuo, Eero N
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-28T13:58:39Z
dc.date.available2017-02-28T13:58:39Z
dc.date.issued2016-11-28
dc.description.abstractAim:<br> The aim of this multicentre, parallel-group randomized clinical trial was to compare the effectiveness of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and a conventional calcium hydroxide liner (CH) as direct pulp capping materials in adult molars with carious pulpal exposure.<br> Methodology:<br> Seventy adults aged 18–55 years were randomly allocated to two parallel arms: MTA (White ProRoot, Dentsply, Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK, USA; n = 33) and CH (Dycal®, Dentsply DeTrey GmbH, Konstanz, Germany; n = 37). The teeth were temporized for 1 week with glass–ionomer (Fuji IX, GC Corp, Tokyo, Japan) and then permanently restored with a composite resin. The subjects were followed up after 1 week and at six, 12, 24 and 36 months. The primary outcome was the survival of the capped pulps, and the secondary outcome was postoperative pain after 1 week. Survival was defined as a nonsymptomatic tooth that responded to sensibility testing and did not exhibit periapical changes on radiograph. At each check-up, the pulp was tested for sensibility and a periapical radiograph was taken (excluding the radiographs taken at the 1-week follow-up). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and log-rank test were used to assess the significant difference in the survival curves between groups. Chi-square test was used to assess the association between the materials and preoperative and postoperative pain.<br> Results:<br> At 36 months, the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed a cumulative estimate rate of 85% for the MTA group and 52% for the CH group (P = 0.006). There was no significant association between the capping material and postoperative pain.<br> Conclusions:<br> Mineral trioxide aggregate performed more effectively than a conventional CH liner as a direct pulp capping material in molars with carious pulpal exposure in adult patients. This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01224925.en_US
dc.descriptionManuscript. Published version available in <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iej.12719> International Endodontic Journal (2016)</a>en_US
dc.identifier.citationKundzina R, Stangvaltaite L, Eriksen HM, Kerosuo E. Capping carious exposures in adults: a randomized controlled trial investigating mineral trioxide aggregate versus calcium hydroxide. International Endodontic Journal. 2016en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 1424394
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/iej.12719
dc.identifier.issn0143-2885
dc.identifier.issn1365-2591
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/10391
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.journalInternational Endodontic Journal
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Klinisk odontologiske fag: 830en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Klinisk odontologiske fag: 830en_US
dc.titleCapping carious exposures in adults: a randomized controlled trial investigating mineral trioxide aggregate versus calcium hydroxideen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


File(s) in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record