• Policing, Undercover Policing and ‘Dirty Hands’: The Case of State Entrapment 

      Tanyi, Attila Geza; McLeod, Stephen K; Hill, Daniel J. (Journal article; Tidsskriftartikkel, 2024)
      Under a ‘dirty hands’ model of undercover policing, it inevitably involves situations where whatever the state agent does is morally problematic. Christopher Nathan argues against this model. Nathan’s criticism of the model is predicated on the contention that it entails the view, which he considers objectionable, that morally wrongful acts are central to undercover policing. We address this criticism, ...
    • A Political Conception of Pandemics and Epidemics in Africa 

      Abumere, Frank Aragbonfoh (Chapter; Bokkapittel, 2019-08-17)
      This chapter is concerned with extra-biological, extra-medical or extra-health factors, namely: actions and inactions (commissions and omissions) that are morally unjust – that is, which are moral injustice – which ultimately cause, enable or contribute to pandemics and epidemics in Africa. Therefore, although this chapter is dealing with health, the framework of the chapter is neither biological ...
    • The politics of Dissensus and Political Liberalism 

      Alnes, Jan Harald (Journal article; Tidsskriftartikkel; Peer reviewed, 2016-07-20)
      An emerging branch of political theory, ‘the politics of dissensus’, starts out from the premise that in order to understand the politics of constitutional democracies, one needs to focus on parliamentary politics, which compromises both institutional settings and debates. Politics takes place among adversaries, and dissensus and argumentation pro et contra is the rule. The focus on the conditions ...
    • Populismens retorikk: trussel eller ressurs for deliberativt demokrati? 

      Jakobsen, Jonas (Journal article; Tidsskriftartikkel; Peer reviewed, 2020)
      Å deliberere (eng: to deliberate) vil si å drøfte noe, for eksempel sannheten av en påstand eller riktigheten av en handling, ved å vurdere grunner for og imot. At en demokratiteori er «deliberativ», betyr som minimum at den tildeler offentlig politisk diskusjon en eller flere sentrale funksjoner i et velfungerende demokrati. Til forskjell fra «aggregative» modeller som fokuserer på stemmegiving ...
    • Pragmatic universalism – A basis of coexistence of multiple diversities 

      De Cuzzani, Paola Maria; Johnsen, Kari Hoftun (Journal article; Tidsskriftartikkel; Peer reviewed, 2015-02-03)
      The authors examine the paradigms hitherto employed to understand and regulate relations between minorities and majority: universalism, multiculturalism/differentialism and interculturalism. These theories are referring to an idea of original purity rooted in a classificatory logic that ultimately inhibits positive coexistence. The complexities of belonging and practices of translation underscore the ...
    • The problem with the individualist approach to the principle of the immunity of non-combatants 

      Abumere, Frank (Journal article; Tidsskriftartikkel; Peer reviewed, 2020-09-25)
      The world is littered with wars in which innocent individual human beings, helpless groups of persons and harmless institutions are casualties because they are directly or indirectly targeted and attacked. The nature or composition of such casualties calls for a revision of, or at least leads one to question, the dominant approach to the principle of non-combatant immunity. In the just war theory, ...
    • Rara avis in Ultima Thule: Libellus festivus Sunnivae des Bouvrie dedicatus / Festschrift for Synnøve des Bouvrie 

      Aspaas, Per Pippin; Albert, Sigrides; Nilsen, Fredrik (Others; Andre, 2014)
    • Rational Hope against Hope? A Pragmatic Approach to Hope and the Ethics of Belief 

      Fremstedal, Roe (Chapter; Bokkapittel, 2019)
      The aim of this paper is to explore apragmatic approach to hope and the ethicsof belief that allowsrationalhope against hope. Hope against hope is hope thatgoes beyond what the evidence supports by hoping for something that is bothhighlyunlikelyand highlyvaluable.¹However,this could take different forms.One could either hope against the evidence or merelygobeyond it; the evidencecould be inconclusive ...
    • Reasons and Beliefs 

      Tanyi, Attila; Morganti, Matteo (Journal article; Tidsskriftartikkel; Peer reviewed, 2018)
      The present paper identifies a challenge for a certain view of practical reasons, according to which practical reasons (both normative and motivating) are states of affairs. The problem is that those who endorse such a view seem forced to maintain both a) that the contents of beliefs are states of affairs and b) that the conception according to which the contents of beliefs are states of affairs is ...
    • Reassessing the Needs for Carbon Dioxide Removal: Moral Implications of Alternative Climate Target Pathways 

      Voget-Kleschin, Lieske; Baatz, Christian; Heyward, Jennifer Clare; van Vuuren, Detlef; Mengis, Nadine (Journal article; Tidsskriftartikkel; Peer reviewed, 2024-01-05)
      Non-technical summary. Scenarios compatible with the Paris agreement’s temperature goal of 1.5 °C involve carbon dioxide removal measures – measures that actively remove CO<sub>2</sub> from the atmosphere – on a massive scale. Such large-scale implementations raise significant ethical problems. Van Vuuren et al. (2018), as well as the current IPCC scenarios, show that reduction in energy and or ...
    • Reflections on the Human Emotions 

      Nafstad, Petter (Book; Bok, 2011)
      <p>The usual way to approach the philosophical study of emotions is to start out from our emotional experiences. The feelings of anger, joy, envy, fear, sadness and so on, that we have all experienced are taken as the given facts, the data, and the research is carried out as an investigation of what is implied and presupposed in such experiences. Such approaches will reveal that emotional states ...
    • Refugee-based Reasons in Refugee Resettlement – The Case of LGBTIQ+ 

      Vitikainen, Annamari (Journal article; Tidsskriftartikkel; Peer reviewed, 2022-06-28)
      This paper discusses a recent turn in the ethics of refugee resettlement which involves taking the interests of refugees themselves into account in the distribution of refugees among potential refugee receiving countries. It argues that there is an important category of interest that does not align with the two commonly held views on what is owed to refugees: ‘safety’ or ‘conditions of a good life’. ...
    • Refugees and minorities: some conceptual and normative issues 

      Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper; Lægaard, Sune (Journal article; Tidsskriftartikkel; Peer reviewed, 2020-03-29)
      In many contexts, states have a duty to take special measures to protect minorities. Does this duty include prioritizing minority over majority refugees? To answer this question, we first show that a vulnerabilityfocused notion of ‘minorities’ is preferable to a numerical one. Given the vulnerability-focused notion, there is a presumption in favour of prioritizing minority over majority refugees. ...
    • Review of John Hawthorne’s Knowledge and Lotteries 

      Borge, Steffen (Journal article; Tidsskriftartikkel; Peer reviewed, 2006)
    • "Rigorismus der Wahrheit" und mythische Signifikanz. Hans Blumenberg über Hannah Arendts "Eichmann in Jerusalem" 

      Himmelmann, Beatrix (Journal article; Tidsskriftartikkel; Peer reviewed, 2022-12-16)
      Hans Blumenberg bringt in einem von ihm selbst nicht veröffentlichten Essay Hannah Arendts Buch über „Eichmann in Jerusalem“ in einen unerwarteten und aufschlussreichen Zusammenhang mit Freuds später Schrift „Der Mann Moses und die monotheistische Religion“. Beide Denker, argumentiert Blumenberg, vertreten einen problematischen „Rigorismus“ der Wahrheit. Doch im Gegensatz zu Arendt, so mutmaßt ...
    • Rose’s Prevention Paradox 

      Thompson, Christopher Jeremy (Journal article; Tidsskriftartikkel, 2016-02-08)
      Geoffrey Rose's ‘prevention paradox’ occurs when a population‐based preventative health measure that brings large benefits to the community – such as compulsory seatbelts, a ‘fat tax’, or mass immunisation – offers little to each participating individual. Although the prevention paradox is not obviously a paradox in the sense in which philosophers understand the term, it does raise important normative ...
    • Safety in numbers: how social choice theory can inform avalanche risk management 

      Ebert, Philip; Morreau, Michael (Journal article; Tidsskriftartikkel; Peer reviewed, 2022-01-21)
      Avalanche studies have undergone a transition in recent years. Early research focused mainly on environmental factors. More recently, attention has turned to human factors in decision making, such as behavioural and cognitive biases. This article adds a social component to this human turn in avalanche studies. It identifies lessons for decision making by groups of skiers from the perspective of ...
    • Samtale og sannhet hos Gadamer og Rorty 

      Solberg, Mariann (Journal article; Tidsskriftartikkel, 2000)
      I dette paperet vil jeg ta for meg Hans-Georg Gadamers filosofiske hermeneutikk, og se den i forhold til Richard Rortys utlegning av hermeneutikken som “edification”. Dette gjør jeg ved å først ta for meg noen trekk ved Gadamers prosjekt slik det framstår i Warheit und Metode, og deretter vil jeg se på den bruk som Rorty gjør av Gadamers hermeneutikk slik det kommer til uttrykk i Philosophy and ...
    • Secession and political capacity 

      Angell, Kim; Huseby, Robert (Journal article; Tidsskriftartikkel; Peer reviewed, 2020-11-30)
      We argue that plebiscitary theories of secession have more permissive implications than has thus far been recognized, by proponents and critics alike. The plebiscitary theory aims to devise a principle for the moral right to secede. This principle implies, we claim, that the view under many circumstances is unable to distinguish between secession of collectives and individuals. Thus, not only large ...
    • Self-Respect and the Importance of Basic Liberties 

      Stensen, Vegard (Journal article; Tidsskriftartikkel; Peer reviewed, 2023-05-18)
      This article discusses the self-respect argument for basic liberties, which is that self-respect is an important good, best supported by basic liberties, and that this yields a reason for the traditional liberty principle. I concentrate on versions of it that contend that self-respect is best supported by basic liberties for reasons related to the recognition that such liberties convey. I first ...