Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorVicha, Jan
dc.contributor.authorNovotny, Jan
dc.contributor.authorStraka, Michal
dc.contributor.authorRepisky, Michal
dc.contributor.authorRuud, Kenneth
dc.contributor.authorKomorovsky, Stanislav
dc.contributor.authorMarek, Radek
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-10T10:34:04Z
dc.date.available2016-03-10T10:34:04Z
dc.date.issued2015-08-25
dc.description.abstractThe role of various factors (structure, solvent, and relativistic treatment) was evaluated for square-planar 4d and 5d transition-metal complexes. The DFT method for calculating the structures was calibrated using a cluster approach and compared to X-ray geometries, with the PBE0 functional (def2-TZVPP basis set) providing the best results, followed closely by the hybrid TPSSH and the MN12SX functionals. Calculations of the NMR chemical shifts using the two-component (2c, Zeroth-Order Regular Approximation as implemented in the ADF package) and four-component (4c, Dirac–Coulomb as implemented in the ReSpect code) relativistic approaches were performed to analyze and demonstrate the importance of solvent corrections (2c) as well as a proper treatment of relativistic effects (4c). The importance of increased exact-exchange admixture in the functional (here PBE0) for reproducing the experimental data using the current implementation of the 2c approach is partly rationalized as a compensation for the missing exchange–correlation response kernel. The kernel contribution was identified to be about 15–20% of the spin–orbit-induced NMR chemical shift, ΔδSO, which roughly corresponds to an increase in ΔδSO introduced by the artificially increased exact-exchange admixture in the functional. Finally, the role of individual effects (geometry, solvent, relativity) in the NMR chemical shift is discussed in selected complexes. Although a fully relativistic DFT approach is still awaiting the implementation of GIAOs for hybrid functionals and an implicit solvent model, it nevertheless provides reliable NMR chemical shift data at an affordable computational cost. It is expected to outperform the 2c approach, in particular for the calculation of NMR parameters in heavy-element compounds.en_US
dc.descriptionPublished version. Source at <a href=http://doi.org/10.1039/c5cp04214c>http://doi.org/10.1039/c5cp04214c</a>. License - <a href=https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/>CC-BY-NC 3.0</a>.en_US
dc.identifier.citationPhysical Chemistry, Chemical Physics - PCCP 2015, 17(38):24944-24955en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 1290143
dc.identifier.doi10.1039/c5cp04214c
dc.identifier.issn1463-9076
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/8831
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-uit_munin_8411
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherRoyal Society of Chemistryen_US
dc.relation.projectIDNorges forskningsråd: 179568en_US
dc.relation.projectIDNorges forskningsråd: 214095en_US
dc.relation.projectIDNorges forskningsråd: 177558en_US
dc.relation.urihttp://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2015/cp/c5cp04214cen_US
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.subjectVDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Kjemi: 440en_US
dc.titleStructure, solvent, and relativistic effects on the NMR chemical shifts in square-planar transition-metal complexes: Assessment of DFT approachesen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel