Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFleten, Nils
dc.contributor.authorJohnsen, Roar
dc.contributor.authorFørde, Olav Helge
dc.date.accessioned2007-08-03T06:50:42Z
dc.date.available2007-08-03T06:50:42Z
dc.date.issued2004-10-12
dc.description.abstractBackground: The knowledge of factors accurately predicting the long lasting sick leaves is sparse, but information on medical condition is believed to be necessary to identify persons at risk. Based on the current practice, with identifying sick-listed individuals at risk of long-lasting sick leaves, the objectives of this study were to inquire the diagnostic accuracy of length of sick leaves predicted in the Norwegian National Insurance Offices, and to compare their predictions with the self-predictions of the sick-listed. Methods: Based on medical certificates, two National Insurance medical consultants and two National Insurance officers predicted, at day 14, the length of sick leave in 993 consecutive cases of sick leave, resulting from musculoskeletal or mental disorders, in this 1-year follow-up study. Two months later they reassessed 322 cases based on extended medical certificates. Self-predictions were obtained in 152 sick-listed subjects when their sick leave passed 14 days. Diagnostic accuracy of the predictions was analysed by ROC area, sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio, and positive predictive value was included in the analyses of predictive validity. Results: The sick-listed identified sick leave lasting 12 weeks or longer with an ROC area of 80.9% (95% CI 73.7–86.8), while the corresponding estimates for medical consultants and officers had ROC areas of 55.6% (95% CI 45.6–65.6%) and 56.0% (95% CI 46.6–65.4%), respectively. The predictions of sick-listed males were significantly better than those of female subjects, and older subjects predicted somewhat better than younger subjects. Neither formal medical competence, nor additional medical information, noticeably improved the diagnostic accuracy based on medical certificates. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the accuracy of a prognosis based on medical documentation in sickness absence forms, is lower than that of one based on direct communication with the sick-listed themselves.en
dc.format.extent321497 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationBMC Public Health 4 (2004), article no 46 pp 11en
dc.identifier.doidoi:10.1186/1471-2458-4-46
dc.identifier.issn1471-2458
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/1130
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-uit_munin_948
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.subjectVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Health sciences: 800::Health service and health administration research: 806en
dc.subjectHelsetjenesteforskningen
dc.subjectHelseadministrasjonsforskningen
dc.subjectLong-lasting sick leavesen
dc.subjectNorwegian National Insuranceen
dc.subjectMedical conditionen
dc.subjectPredictionsen
dc.titleLength of sick leave – Why not ask the sick-listed? Sick-listed individuals predict their length of sick leave more accurately than professionalsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen
dc.typePeer reviewed


File(s) in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record