dc.contributor.author | Heiberg, Guri Anita | |
dc.contributor.author | Pedersen, Synne Garder | |
dc.contributor.author | Friborg, Oddgeir | |
dc.contributor.author | Nielsen, Jørgen Feldbæk | |
dc.contributor.author | Holm, Henriette Stabel | |
dc.contributor.author | von Steinbüchel, Nicole | |
dc.contributor.author | Arntzen, Cathrine | |
dc.contributor.author | Anke, Audny | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-12-05T10:53:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-12-05T10:53:43Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.description.abstract | <i><p>Background</i>:
Brief measures of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) that assess both patient-reported functioning and well-being after stroke are scarce. The objective of this study was to examine reliability and validity of one of these measures, the patient-reported Quality of Life after Brain Injury–Overall Scale (QOLIBRI-OS), in patients after stroke.</p>
<i><p>Methods</i>:
Stroke survivors were examined prospectively using survey methods. Core survey data (n = 125) and retest data (n = 36) were obtained at 3 and 12 months, respectively. Item properties (distribution, floor and ceiling effects), psychometric properties (reliability and model fit), and validity (correlations with established measures of anxiety, depression and HRQOL) of the QOLIBRI-OS were examined.</p>
<i><p>Results</i>:
Missing responses on the questionnaire were low (0.5%). All items were positively skewed. No floor effects were present, whereas five out of six items showed ceiling effects. The summary QOLIBRI-OS score exhibited no floor or ceiling effects, and had excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α =0.93). All item-total correlations were high (0.73–0.88). The test-retest reliability of single items varied from 0.74 to 0.91 and was 0.93 for the overall score. The confirmatory factor analysis yielded an excellent fit for a five-item version and provided tentative support for the original six-item version. The convergent validity correlations were in the hypothesized directions, thus supporting the construct validity.</p>
<i><p>Conclusions</i>:
The brief QOLIBRI-OS is a valid and reliable brief health-related outcome measure that is appropriate for screening HRQOL in patients after stroke.</p> | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Health region North Norway | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Heiberg. G., Pedersen, S.G., Friborg, O., Nielsen, J.F., Holm, H.S., von Steinbüchel, N., ... Anke, A. (2018). Can the health related quality of life measure QOLIBRI- overall scale (OS) be of use after stroke? A validation study. <i>BMC Neurology</i>, 18(98). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-018-1101-9 | en_US |
dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 1616243 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s12883-018-1101-9 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1471-2377 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/14287 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | BMC | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Heiberg, G.A. (2021). Rehabilitation pathways, satisfaction with functioning and wellbeing, and experienced rehabilitation needs after stroke. (Doctoral thesis). <a href=https://hdl.handle.net/10037/22886>https://hdl.handle.net/10037/22886</a>. | |
dc.relation.journal | BMC Neurology | |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | VDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Clinical medical disciplines: 750::Neurology: 752 | en_US |
dc.subject | VDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Klinisk medisinske fag: 750::Nevrologi: 752 | en_US |
dc.subject | QOLIBRI-OS | en_US |
dc.subject | Stroke | en_US |
dc.subject | Health related quality of life | en_US |
dc.subject | Validity | en_US |
dc.title | Can the health related quality of life measure QOLIBRI- overall scale (OS) be of use after stroke? A validation study | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |