Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorAlsos, Inger Greve
dc.contributor.authorLammers, Youri
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-20T13:58:04Z
dc.date.available2020-02-20T13:58:04Z
dc.date.issued2020-02-28
dc.description.abstractThis thesis explores the potential of sedimentary ancient DNA (sedaDNA) from lakes as a tool for studying past communities. First it sets out to determine what taxa in the environment are most likely to be detected in lake sediments. For this, vegetation surveys were carried out around eleven different lakes in Norway and the taxa detected based on plant metabarcoding of the lake sediments were compared to the recorded flora. The taxa detected in the lake sediments primarily resembled those growing either in the lake or within the immediate surrounding. Furthermore, taxa abundant in the vegetation were more likely to be detected based on DNA. Three different studies were carried out to compare plant sedaDNA results to traditional palaeoecological proxies such as pollen or macrofossils. The results indicate that overall sedaDNA is capable of detecting more taxa than the alternative methods, though differences are observed between the shotgun and metabarcode methods tested, as well as the lakes themselves. A separate study aimed to detect mammals based on sedaDNA, which proved to be more problematic. Co-amplification of off-target taxa, the presence of common lab contaminants and a general low amount of template material hindered the identification of mammals present. However, the detection of “bycatch” worm taxa demonstrates their potential for palaeoenvironmental reconstructions. Finally, the shotgun sequencing of two algal rich sediment layers allowed for both the reconstruction of the algal organelle genomes, as well as the exploration of the present within lake populations.en_US
dc.description.doctoraltypeph.d.en_US
dc.description.popularabstractSedimentary ancient DNA (sedaDNA) from lakes is a promising tool for studying past communities, but some uncertainties remain. The first paper compared vegetation around a lake to the species detected based on environmental DNA. The results indicated that species that were abundant or growing adjacent to the lake were more likely to be detected in the sediments. Three additional papers compared sedaDNA methods to traditional pollen and macrofossil identifications. One comparison indicated that both sedaDNA and pollen were capable of identifying the major vegetation types. However the remaining two comparisons noted larger differences, possibly due to a lack of reference material or competition with algal DNA. The detection of mammals remained problematic, possibly due to a low biomass, though invertebrates such as worms were easier to detect. Finally, it was possible to retrieve full organelle genomes from sediments, which allows for more genetic analysis beyond simple identifications.en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-82-8266-177-5
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/17437
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUiT The Arctic University of Norwayen_US
dc.publisherUiT Norges arktiske universiteten_US
dc.relation.haspartPaper I: Alsos, I.G., Lammers, Y., Yoccoz, N.G., Jørgensen, T., Sjögren, P., Gielly, L. & Edwards, M.E. (2018). Plant DNA Metabarcoding of Lake Sediments: How Does It Represent the Contemporary Vegetation. <i>PloS One, 13</i>(4): e0195403. Also available in Munin at <a href=https://hdl.handle.net/10037/13448>https://hdl.handle.net/10037/13448. </a><p> <p>Paper II: Clarke, C.L., Edwards, M.E., Brown, A.G., Gielly, L., Lammers, Y., Heintzman, P.D. … Alsos, I.G. (2018). Holocene Floristic Diversity and Richness in Northeast Norway Revealed by Sedimentary ancient DNA (<i>seda</i>DNA) and Pollen. <i>Boreas, 48</i>(2), 299–316. Also available in Munin at <a href=https://hdl.handle.net/10037/14481>https://hdl.handle.net/10037/14481. </a><p> <p>Paper III: Lammers, Y., Clarke, C.L., Erséus, C., Brown, A.G., Edwards, M.E., Gielly, L. … Alsos, I.G. (2019). Clitellate Worms (Annelida) in Lateglacial and Holocene sedimentary DNA records from the Polar Urals and Northern Norway. <i>Boreas, 48</i>(2), 317– 329. Also available in Munin at <a href=https://hdl.handle.net/10037/17381>https://hdl.handle.net/10037/17381. </a><p> <p>Paper IV: Parducci, L., Alsos, I.G., Unneberg, P., Pedersen, M.W., Han, L., Lammers, Y. … Wohlfarth, B. (2019). Shotgun Environmental DNA, Pollen, and Macrofossil Analysis of Lateglacial Lake Sediments From Southern Sweden. <i>Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution</i>, 7:189. Also available in Munin at <a href=https://hdl.handle.net/10037/16487>https://hdl.handle.net/10037/16487. </a><p> <p>Paper V: Alsos, I.G., Sjögren, P., Brown, A.G., Gielly, L., Merkel, M.K.F., Paus, A. … van der Bilt, W.G.M. Last Glacial Maximum environmental condition of Andøya, a northern ice-edge ecological “hotspot”. (Manuscript). <p> <p>Paper VI: Lammers, Y., Heintzman, P.D. & Alsos, I.G. Environmental palaeogenomic reconstruction of an Ice Age algal population. (Manuscript).en_US
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The Author(s)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)en_US
dc.subjectsedimentary ancient DNAen_US
dc.subjectBioinformaticsen_US
dc.subjectenvironmental DNAen_US
dc.titleSedimentary ancient DNA: Exploring methods of ancient DNA analysis for different taxonomic groupsen_US
dc.typeDoctoral thesisen_US
dc.typeDoktorgradsavhandlingen_US


File(s) in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)