Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKaravasiloglou, Nena
dc.contributor.authorHüsing, Anika
dc.contributor.authorMasala, Giovanna
dc.contributor.authorvan Gils, Carla H.
dc.contributor.authorFortner, Renée Turzanski
dc.contributor.authorChang-Claude, Jenny
dc.contributor.authorHuybrechts, Inge
dc.contributor.authorWeiderpass, Elisabete
dc.contributor.authorGunter, Marc
dc.contributor.authorArveux, Patrick
dc.contributor.authorFournier, Agnès
dc.contributor.authorKvaskoff, Marina
dc.contributor.authorTjønneland, Anne
dc.contributor.authorKyrø, Cecilie
dc.contributor.authorDahm, Christina C.
dc.contributor.authorVistisen, Helene Tilma
dc.contributor.authorBakker, Marije F.
dc.contributor.authorSánchez, María-José
dc.contributor.authorChirlaque López, María Dolores
dc.contributor.authorSantiuste, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorArdanaz, Eva
dc.contributor.authorMenéndez, Virginia
dc.contributor.authorAgudo, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorTrichopoulou, Antonia
dc.contributor.authorKarakatsani, Anna
dc.contributor.authorLa Vecchia, Carlo
dc.contributor.authorPeppa, Eleni
dc.contributor.authorPalli, Domenico
dc.contributor.authorAgnoli, Claudia
dc.contributor.authorPanico, Salvatore
dc.contributor.authorTumino, Rosario
dc.contributor.authorSacerdote, Carlotta
dc.contributor.authorButt, Salma Tunå
dc.contributor.authorBorgquist, Signe
dc.contributor.authorSkeie, Guri
dc.contributor.authorSchulze, Matthias
dc.contributor.authorKey, Timothy
dc.contributor.authorKhaw, Kay-Tee
dc.contributor.authorTsilidis, Konstantinos K.
dc.contributor.authorEllingjord-Dale, Merete
dc.contributor.authorRiboli, Elio
dc.contributor.authorKaaks, Rudolf
dc.contributor.authorDossus, Laure
dc.contributor.authorRohrmann, Sabine
dc.contributor.authorKühn, Tilman
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-25T08:23:40Z
dc.date.available2020-02-25T08:23:40Z
dc.date.issued2019-12-02
dc.description.abstract<i>Background</i> - Even though in situ breast cancer (BCIS) accounts for a large proportion of the breast cancers diagnosed, few studies have investigated potential risk factors for BCIS. Their results suggest that some established risk factors for invasive breast cancer have a similar impact on BCIS risk, but large population-based studies on lifestyle factors and BCIS risk are lacking. Thus, we investigated the association between lifestyle and BCIS risk within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort.<p><p> <i>Methods</i> - Lifestyle was operationalized by a score reflecting the adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) cancer prevention recommendations. The recommendations utilized in these analyses were the ones pertinent to healthy body weight, physical activity, consumption of plant-based foods, energy-dense foods, red and processed meat, and sugary drinks and alcohol, as well as the recommendation on breastfeeding. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the association between lifestyle score and BCIS risk. The results were presented as hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI).<p><p> <i>Results</i> - After an overall median follow-up time of 14.9 years, 1277 BCIS cases were diagnosed. Greater adherence to the WCRF/AICR cancer prevention recommendations was not associated with BCIS risk (HR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.93–1.03; per one unit of increase; multivariable model). An inverse association between the lifestyle score and BCIS risk was observed in study centers, where participants were recruited mainly via mammographic screening and attended additional screening throughout follow-up (HR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.73–0.99), but not in the remaining ones (HR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.94–1.05).<p><p> <i>Conclusions</i> - While we did not observe an overall association between lifestyle and BCIS risk, our results indicate that lifestyle is associated with BCIS risk among women recruited via screening programs and with regular screening participation. This suggests that a true inverse association between lifestyle habits and BCIS risk in the overall cohort may have been masked by a lack of information on screening attendance. The potential inverse association between lifestyle and BCIS risk in our analyses is consistent with the inverse associations between lifestyle scores and breast cancer risk reported from previous studies.en_US
dc.identifier.citationKaravasiloglou, Hüsing A, Masala G, van Gils CH, Fortner RT, Chang-Claude J, Huybrechts I, Weiderpass E, Gunter M, Arveux P, Fournier A, Kvaskoff M, Tjønneland A, Kyrø C, Dahm CC, Vistisen, Bakker MF, Sánchez M, Chirlaque López MD, Santiuste C, Ardanaz E, Menéndez V, Agudo A, Trichopoulou A, Karakatsani A, La Vecchia C, Peppa E, Palli D, Agnoli C, Panico S, Tumino R, Sacerdote C, Butt ST, Borgquist S, Skeie G, Schulze M, Key T, Khaw K, Tsilidis KK, Ellingjord-Dale M, Riboli E, Kaaks R, Dossus L, Rohrmann S, Kühn T. Adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research cancer prevention recommendations and risk of in situ breast cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort. BMC Medicine. 2019;17:221:1-11en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 1796741
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12916-019-1444-0
dc.identifier.issn1741-7015
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/17469
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.relation.journalBMC Medicine
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/DG-SANCO/?/EU/?/?/en_US
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2019 The Author(s)en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medical disciplines: 700en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700en_US
dc.titleAdherence to the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research cancer prevention recommendations and risk of in situ breast cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohorten_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel