Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBrox, Hilde
dc.contributor.authorGuttormsen, Sigve
dc.contributor.authorStenersen, Elias
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-16T09:57:26Z
dc.date.available2020-07-16T09:57:26Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-29
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates how teachers of English understand critical thinking, and how they act upon their understanding in their teaching. Additionally, this study also investigates how students experience their teachers practice of critical thinking in the EFL classroom. The current curriculum of LK06 is in a gradual change towards the subject renewal LK20, a change that is paralleled by the increasing focus on digital technology in education. In a historical perspective, the need for critical attitudes in school settings has seen a curricular development from the late 80’s until today with an increasing focus on technology as an integral part of human life. To address contemporary challenges and opportunities, the Department of Education and Training has implemented a digitalization plan that lays guiding principles from 2017-2021. Critical thinking is a central term for the new curriculum and for the digitalization plan. A supplementing press release exemplifies the English subject as one of the subjects that should nurture critical thinking skills among students. As of today, teachers must include digital skills in the English subject, a basic skill that incorporates aspects of critical information processing using digital tools. The current thesis is motivated by the multiple mentions of critical thinking as a desired English subject skill in the intersection between technology, language and education. To investigate the field, we have conducted qualitative research interviews where four different EFL teachers participated. Subsequently, a selection of the teachers’ students were interviewed in groups. Our findings indicate that the teachers put a strong emphasis on critical thinking as an integral part of evaluating digital information. Further, the teachers appear to implement critical thinking in their EFL practice in an implicit and context-sensitive manner. Their students mostly experience critical thinking as a term that is incorporated into criteria for written and oral tasks, and as a subject of conversation in relation to evaluating digital information in the EFL classroom. Moreover, our findings indicate that meta-language in policy documents is susceptible to ambiguity. This is highlighted by the inconsistent definitions that arose in parts of the conversational discourse. What seems evident, is that terms such as critical thinking – can take on multiple meanings and necessitate contextual factors to attain a common definition from practitioners in the field. This last point is not investigated exhaustively, thus providing future researchers with an intriguing perspective.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/18853
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUiT Norges arktiske universiteten_US
dc.publisherUiT The Arctic University of Norwayen_US
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The Author(s)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)en_US
dc.subject.courseIDLRU-3902
dc.subjectVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Pedagogiske fag: 280::Fagdidaktikk: 283en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Social science: 200::Education: 280::Subject didactics: 283en_US
dc.subjectEnglishen_US
dc.subjectCritical Thinkingen_US
dc.subjectEFLen_US
dc.subjectDigital Skillsen_US
dc.titleCritical thinking as part of digital skills in EFL education. A qualitative study of how teachers and their students understand the concept of critical thinking.en_US
dc.typeMaster thesisen_US
dc.typeMastergradsoppgaveen_US


File(s) in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)