Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGibbs, David Corley
dc.contributor.authorSong, Mingyang
dc.contributor.authorMcCullough, Marjorie L.
dc.contributor.authorUm, Caroline Y.
dc.contributor.authorBostick, Roberd M.
dc.contributor.authorWu, Kana
dc.contributor.authorFlanders, W. Dana
dc.contributor.authorGiovannucci, Edward
dc.contributor.authorJenab, Mazda
dc.contributor.authorBrustad, Magritt
dc.contributor.authorTjønneland, Anne
dc.contributor.authorPerez-Cornago, Aurora
dc.contributor.authorTrichopoulou, Antonia
dc.contributor.authorTsilidis, Konstantinos K.
dc.contributor.authorHultdin, Johan
dc.contributor.authorGurrea, Aurelio Barricarte
dc.contributor.authorBueno-De-Mesquita, Bas
dc.contributor.authorMahamat-Saleh, Yahya
dc.contributor.authorKühn, Tilman
dc.contributor.authorGunter, Marc
dc.contributor.authorWeiderpass, Elisabete
dc.contributor.authorFedirko, Veronika
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-08T12:45:50Z
dc.date.available2021-04-08T12:45:50Z
dc.date.issued2019-10-15
dc.description.abstract<i>Background</i> - Higher circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin-D [25(OH)D] concentrations are consistently inversely associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) risk in observational studies. However, it is unknown whether this association depends on the functional GC-rs4588*A (Thr436Lys) variant encoding the vitamin D–binding protein-2 (DBP2) isoform, which may affect vitamin D status and bioavailability.<p> <p><i>Methods</i> - We analyzed data from 1710 incident CRC cases and 1649 incidence-density–matched controls nested within three prospective cohorts of mostly Caucasians. Study-specific incidence rate ratios (RRs) for associations of prediagnostic, season-standardized 25(OH)D concentrations according to DBP2 isoform with CRC were estimated using multivariable unconditional logistic regression and were pooled using fixed-effects models. All statistical significance tests were two-sided.<p> <p><i>Results</i> - The odds of having 25(OH)D concentrations less than 50 nmol/L (considered insufficient by the Institute of Medicine) were 43% higher for each DBP2-encoding variant (rs4588*A) inherited (per DBP2 odds ratio [OR] = 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.27 to 1.62, P<sub>trend</sub> = 1.2 × 10−8). The association of 25(OH)D concentrations with CRC risk differed by DBP2: 25(OH)D concentrations considered sufficient (≥ 50 nmol/L), relative to deficient (< 30 nmol/L), were associated with a 53% lower CRC risk among individuals with the DBP2 isoform (RR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.67), but with a non–statistically significant 12% lower risk among individuals without it (RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.61 to 1.27) (P<sub>heterogeneity</sub> = .01). Conclusions Our results suggest that the 25(OH)D-CRC association may differ by DBP isoform, and those with a DBP2-encoding genotype linked to vitamin D insufficiency may particularly benefit from adequate 25(OH)D for CRC prevention.en_US
dc.identifier.citationGibbs, Song, McCullough, Um, Bostick, Wu, Flanders, Giovannucci, Jenab, Brustad, Tjønneland, Perez-Cornago, Trichopoulou, Tsilidis, Hultdin, Gurrea, Bueno-De-Mesquita, Mahamat-Saleh, Kühn, Gunter, Weiderpass, Fedirko. Association of circulating Vitamin D with colorectal cancer depends on Vitamin D-binding protein isoforms: A pooled, nested, case-control study. JNCI Cancer Spectrum. 2020;4:pkz083(1):1-8en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 1899669
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/jncics/pkz083
dc.identifier.issn2515-5091
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/20822
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.relation.journalJNCI Cancer Spectrum
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/DG-SANCO/?/?/?/?/en_US
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The Author(s)en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Health sciences: 800::Community medicine, Social medicine: 801en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800::Samfunnsmedisin, sosialmedisin: 801en_US
dc.titleAssociation of circulating Vitamin D with colorectal cancer depends on Vitamin D-binding protein isoforms: A pooled, nested, case-control studyen_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel