Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorKasper, Jürgen
dc.contributor.advisorOfstad, Eirik
dc.contributor.authorKristiansen, Maria
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-31T08:41:15Z
dc.date.available2021-05-31T08:41:15Z
dc.date.issued2016-05-31
dc.description.abstract<p>Background: In recent years, the concept of shared decision making (SDM) has gained support in the medical community. SDM has also been supported by legal documents as the best model of medical decision making. In light of this, development of instruments measuring the degree of patient involvement in clinical consultations has increased. MAPPIN’SDM is the first instrument to be validated and translated to Norwegian. While observation based evaluation is highly dependable on the competency of observers, empirical studies on ideal models for rater training is lacking. This study aims to evaluate and adjust the Norwegian rater training curriculum for MAPPIN’SDM. <p>Method: In this feasibility and validation study, a standardized 4 days rater-training program was applied to a group of three trainees with no previous experience with the instrument. Ratings performed on videotaped clinical consultations relevant for SDM were used to calculate inter-rater reliability using T-coefficients (modified Cohen’s kappa) and percentage agreement (%A). <p>Results: Inter-rater reliabilities during the training were moderate to strong on average over the 11 items of each of three observer-scales (Tmean: MAPPINdoctor = .62, range= .41-.91; MAPPINpatient = .66, range= .36-1.0; MAPPINdyad= .59, range= .30 - .91). All trainees achieved accurate compared to the reference standard with regard to both sensitivity (sensitivitymean: MAPPINdoctor= 90, range= 56 - 100%; MAPPINpatient= 83, range= 38 - 100%; MAPPINdyad= 92, range: 64 - 100%) and specificity (specificitymean: MAPPINdoctor= 83, range= 56 - 97%; MAPPINpatient= 81, range: 33 - 100%; MAPPINdyad= 90, range: 81 - 100%). The results also show that the new curriculum is capable to develop high to excellent rater competency within a 4 day rater-training program. <p>Conclusion: The observer training curriculum corresponding to the MAPPIN’SDM observer scales proves feasible and capable to develop high observer competencies. In addition, the study reveals a need for evaluated trainings necessary for making use of observation-based communication assessment scales in general.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/21287
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUiT Norges arktiske universiteten_US
dc.publisherUiT The Arctic University of Norwayen_US
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2016 The Author(s)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)en_US
dc.subject.courseIDMED-3950
dc.subjectVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800::Samfunnsmedisin, sosialmedisin: 801en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Health sciences: 800::Community medicine, Social medicine: 801en_US
dc.titleEvaluation of an observer training curriculum using the Multifocal Approach to the sharing In the Shared Decision Making (MAPPIN’SDM) - An instrument for evaluating shared decision making in patient consultationsen_US
dc.typeMaster thesisen_US
dc.typeMastergradsoppgaveen_US


File(s) in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)