Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorVonen, Barthold
dc.contributor.authorAugestad, Knut Magne
dc.contributor.authorAspevik, Ranveig
dc.contributor.authorNorum, Jan
dc.contributor.authorNestvold, Torunn
dc.contributor.authorLindsetmo, Rolv-Ole
dc.contributor.authorRingberg, Unni
dc.contributor.authorJohnsen, Roar
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-30T12:34:26Z
dc.date.available2009-09-30T12:34:26Z
dc.date.issued2008-06-25
dc.description.abstractBackground: All patients who undergo surgery for colon cancer are followed up according to the guidelines of the Norwegian Gastrointestinal Cancer Group (NGICG). These guidelines state that the aims of follow-up after surgery are to perform quality assessment, provide support and improve survival. In Norway, most of these patients are followed up in a hospital setting. We describe a multi-centre randomized controlled trial to test whether these patients can be followed up by their general practitioner (GP) without altering quality of life, cost effectiveness and/or the incidence of serious clinical events. <br> Methods and Design: Patients undergoing surgery for colon cancer with histological grade Dukes's Stage A, B or C and below 75 years of age are eligible for inclusion. They will be randomized after surgery to follow-up at the surgical outpatient clinic (control group) or followup by the district GP (intervention group). Both study arms comply with the national NGICG guidelines. The primary endpoints will be quality of life (QoL) (measured by the EORTC QLQ C- 30 and the EQ-5D instruments), serious clinical events (SCEs), and costs. The follow-up period will be two years after surgery, and quality of life will be measured every three months. SCEs and costs will be estimated prospectively. The sample size was 170 patients. <br> Discussion: There is an ongoing debate on the best method of follow-up for patients with CRC. Due to a wide range of follow-up programmes and paucity of randomized trials, it is impossible to draw conclusions about the best combination and frequency of clinic (or family practice) visits, blood tests, endoscopic procedures and radiological examinations that maximize the clinical outcome, quality of life and costs. Most studies on follow-up of CRC patients have been performed in a hospital outpatient setting. We hypothesize that postoperative follow-up of colon cancer patients (according to national guidelines) by GPs will not have any impact on patients' quality of life. Furthermore, we hypothesize that there will be no increase in SCEs and that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio will improve. <br> Trial registration: This trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. The trial registration number is: NCT00572143en
dc.descriptionThis article is part of Knut Magne Augestad's PhD thesis, which is available in Munin at <a href=http://hdl.handle.net/10037/5167>http://hdl.handle.net/10037/5167</a>en
dc.format.extent294150 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationBMC Health Services Research 2008, 8:137en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/2145
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-uit_munin_1896
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.subjectVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Clinical medical disciplines: 750::General surgery: 780en
dc.titleShould the surgeon or the general practitioner (GP) follow up patients after surgery for colon cancer? A randomized controlled trial protocol focusing on quality of life, cost-effectiveness and serious clinical eventsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel