Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSivertsen, Marianne
dc.contributor.authorArntzen, Ellen Christin
dc.contributor.authorAlstadhaug, Karl Bjørnar
dc.contributor.authorNormann, Britt
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-28T09:10:50Z
dc.date.available2022-09-28T09:10:50Z
dc.date.issued2022-09-19
dc.description.abstractBackground: Research on stroke rehabilitation often addresses common difficulties such as gait, balance or physical activity separately, a fragmentation contrasting the complexity in clinical practice. Interventions aiming for recovery are needed. The purpose of this study was to investigate effects of a comprehensive low-cost physical therapy intervention, ICoreDIST, vs. usual care on postural control, balance, physical activity, gait and health related quality of life during the first 12 weeks post-stroke.<p> <p>Methods: This prospective, assessor-masked randomized controlled trial included 60 participants from two stroke units in Norway. Participants, who were randomized to I-CoreDIST (n = 29) or usual care physical therapy (n = 31), received 5 sessions/week when in-patients or 3 sessions/week as out-patients. Primary outcomes were the Trunk Impairment Scale-modified Norwegian version (TISmodNV) and activity monitoring (ActiGraphsWgt3X-BT). Secondary outcomes were the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke, MiniBesTEST, 10- meter walk test, 2-minute walk test, force-platform measurements and EQ5D3L. Stroke specific quality of life scale was administered at 12 weeks. Linear regression and non-parametric tests were used for statistical analysis. <p>Results: Five participants were excluded and seven lost to follow-up, leaving 48 participants in the intention-to-treat analysis. There were no significant between-group effects for primary outcomes: TIS-modNV (p = 0,857); daily average minutes of sedative (p = 0.662), light (p = 0.544) or moderate activity (p = 0.239) and steps (p = 0.288), or secondary outcomes at 12 weeks except for significant improvements on EQ5D-3L in the usual care group. Withingroup changes were significant for all outcomes in both groups except for activity levels that were low, EQ5D-3L favoring the usual care group, and forceplatform data favoring the intervention group. <p>Conclusions: Physical therapy treatment with I-CoreDIST improved postural control, balance, physical activity and gait during the first 12 weeks after a stroke but is not superior to usual care.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSivertsen M, Arntzen EC, Alstadhaug KB, Normann B. Effect of innovative vs. usual care physical therapy in subacute rehabilitation after stroke. A multicenter randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences. 2022;3en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 2056016
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fresc.2022.987601
dc.identifier.issn2673-6861
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/26917
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSivertsen, M. (2023). Stroke rehabilitation. A mixed method study evaluating a novel physiotherapy intervention and patients’ experiences. (Doctoral thesis). <a href=https://hdl.handle.net/10037/29213>https://hdl.handle.net/10037/29213</a>.
dc.relation.journalFrontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2022 The Author(s)en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)en_US
dc.titleEffect of innovative vs. usual care physical therapy in subacute rehabilitation after stroke. A multicenter randomized controlled trialen_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Med mindre det står noe annet, er denne innførselens lisens beskrevet som Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)