dc.contributor.author | Sivertsen, Marianne | |
dc.contributor.author | Arntzen, Ellen Christin | |
dc.contributor.author | Alstadhaug, Karl Bjørnar | |
dc.contributor.author | Normann, Britt | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-09-28T09:10:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-09-28T09:10:50Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-09-19 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Research on stroke rehabilitation often addresses common
difficulties such as gait, balance or physical activity separately, a
fragmentation contrasting the complexity in clinical practice. Interventions
aiming for recovery are needed. The purpose of this study was to investigate
effects of a comprehensive low-cost physical therapy intervention, ICoreDIST, vs. usual care on postural control, balance, physical activity, gait
and health related quality of life during the first 12 weeks post-stroke.<p>
<p>Methods: This prospective, assessor-masked randomized controlled trial
included 60 participants from two stroke units in Norway. Participants, who
were randomized to I-CoreDIST (n = 29) or usual care physical therapy (n = 31),
received 5 sessions/week when in-patients or 3 sessions/week as out-patients.
Primary outcomes were the Trunk Impairment Scale-modified Norwegian
version (TISmodNV) and activity monitoring (ActiGraphsWgt3X-BT). Secondary
outcomes were the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke, MiniBesTEST, 10-
meter walk test, 2-minute walk test, force-platform measurements and EQ5D3L. Stroke specific quality of life scale was administered at 12 weeks. Linear
regression and non-parametric tests were used for statistical analysis.
<p>Results: Five participants were excluded and seven lost to follow-up, leaving 48
participants in the intention-to-treat analysis. There were no significant
between-group effects for primary outcomes: TIS-modNV (p = 0,857); daily
average minutes of sedative (p = 0.662), light (p = 0.544) or moderate activity
(p = 0.239) and steps (p = 0.288), or secondary outcomes at 12 weeks except
for significant improvements on EQ5D-3L in the usual care group. Withingroup changes were significant for all outcomes in both groups except for
activity levels that were low, EQ5D-3L favoring the usual care group, and forceplatform data favoring the intervention group.
<p>Conclusions: Physical therapy treatment with I-CoreDIST improved postural
control, balance, physical activity and gait during the first 12 weeks after a
stroke but is not superior to usual care. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Sivertsen M, Arntzen EC, Alstadhaug KB, Normann B. Effect of innovative vs. usual care physical therapy in subacute rehabilitation after stroke. A multicenter randomized
controlled trial. Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences. 2022;3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 2056016 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3389/fresc.2022.987601 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2673-6861 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/26917 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Frontiers Media | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Sivertsen, M. (2023). Stroke rehabilitation. A mixed method study evaluating a novel physiotherapy intervention and patients’ experiences. (Doctoral thesis). <a href=https://hdl.handle.net/10037/29213>https://hdl.handle.net/10037/29213</a>. | |
dc.relation.journal | Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences | |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright 2022 The Author(s) | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) | en_US |
dc.title | Effect of innovative vs. usual care physical therapy in subacute rehabilitation after stroke. A multicenter randomized
controlled trial | en_US |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |