Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSivertsen, Marianne
dc.contributor.authorArntzen, Ellen Christin
dc.contributor.authorAlstadhaug, Karl Bjørnar
dc.contributor.authorNormann, Britt
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-28T09:10:50Z
dc.date.available2022-09-28T09:10:50Z
dc.date.issued2022-09-19
dc.description.abstractBackground: Research on stroke rehabilitation often addresses common difficulties such as gait, balance or physical activity separately, a fragmentation contrasting the complexity in clinical practice. Interventions aiming for recovery are needed. The purpose of this study was to investigate effects of a comprehensive low-cost physical therapy intervention, ICoreDIST, vs. usual care on postural control, balance, physical activity, gait and health related quality of life during the first 12 weeks post-stroke.<p> <p>Methods: This prospective, assessor-masked randomized controlled trial included 60 participants from two stroke units in Norway. Participants, who were randomized to I-CoreDIST (n = 29) or usual care physical therapy (n = 31), received 5 sessions/week when in-patients or 3 sessions/week as out-patients. Primary outcomes were the Trunk Impairment Scale-modified Norwegian version (TISmodNV) and activity monitoring (ActiGraphsWgt3X-BT). Secondary outcomes were the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke, MiniBesTEST, 10- meter walk test, 2-minute walk test, force-platform measurements and EQ5D3L. Stroke specific quality of life scale was administered at 12 weeks. Linear regression and non-parametric tests were used for statistical analysis. <p>Results: Five participants were excluded and seven lost to follow-up, leaving 48 participants in the intention-to-treat analysis. There were no significant between-group effects for primary outcomes: TIS-modNV (p = 0,857); daily average minutes of sedative (p = 0.662), light (p = 0.544) or moderate activity (p = 0.239) and steps (p = 0.288), or secondary outcomes at 12 weeks except for significant improvements on EQ5D-3L in the usual care group. Withingroup changes were significant for all outcomes in both groups except for activity levels that were low, EQ5D-3L favoring the usual care group, and forceplatform data favoring the intervention group. <p>Conclusions: Physical therapy treatment with I-CoreDIST improved postural control, balance, physical activity and gait during the first 12 weeks after a stroke but is not superior to usual care.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSivertsen M, Arntzen EC, Alstadhaug KB, Normann B. Effect of innovative vs. usual care physical therapy in subacute rehabilitation after stroke. A multicenter randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences. 2022;3en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 2056016
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fresc.2022.987601
dc.identifier.issn2673-6861
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/26917
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSivertsen, M. (2023). Stroke rehabilitation. A mixed method study evaluating a novel physiotherapy intervention and patients’ experiences. (Doctoral thesis). <a href=https://hdl.handle.net/10037/29213>https://hdl.handle.net/10037/29213</a>.
dc.relation.journalFrontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2022 The Author(s)en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)en_US
dc.titleEffect of innovative vs. usual care physical therapy in subacute rehabilitation after stroke. A multicenter randomized controlled trialen_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


File(s) in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)