Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorRothman, Jason
dc.contributor.authorBayram, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorDeLuca, Vincent
dc.contributor.authorDi Pisa, Grazia
dc.contributor.authorDunabeitia, Jon Andoni
dc.contributor.authorGharibi, Khadij
dc.contributor.authorHao, Jiuzhou
dc.contributor.authorKolb, Nadine
dc.contributor.authorKubota, Maki
dc.contributor.authorKupisch, Tanja
dc.contributor.authorLaméris, Tim
dc.contributor.authorLuque, Alicia
dc.contributor.authorvan Osch, Brechje
dc.contributor.authorSoares, Sergio Miguel Pereira
dc.contributor.authorPrystauka, Yanina
dc.contributor.authorTat, Deniz
dc.contributor.authorTomic, Aleksandra
dc.contributor.authorVoits, Toms
dc.contributor.authorWulff, Stefanie
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-19T09:06:48Z
dc.date.available2022-10-19T09:06:48Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractHerein, we contextualize, problematize and offer some insights for moving beyond the problem of monolingual comparative normativity in (psycho)linguistic research on bilingualism. We argue that, in the vast majority of cases, juxtaposing (functional) monolinguals to bilinguals fails to offer what the comparison is supposedly intended to do: meet the standards of empirical control in line with the scientific method. Instead, the default nature of monolingual comparative normativity has historically contributed to inequalities in many facets of bilingualism research and continues to impede progress on multiple levels. Beyond framing our views on the matter, we offer some epistemological considerations and methodological alternatives to this standard practice that improve empirical rigor while fostering increased diversity, inclusivity and equity in our field.en_US
dc.descriptionAccepted manuscript, to appeared in Applied Psycholinguistics: <a href=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/applied-psycholinguistics>https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/applied-psycholinguistics</a>.en_US
dc.identifier.citationRothman, Bayram, DeLuca, Di Pisa, Dunabeitia, Gharibi, Hao, Kolb, Kubota, Kupisch, Laméris, Luque, van Osch, Soares, Prystauka, Tat, Tomic, Voits, Wulff. Monolingual comparative normativity in bilingualism research is out of “control”: Arguments and alternatives. Applied Psycholinguistics. 2022en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 2061121
dc.identifier.issn0142-7164
dc.identifier.issn1469-1817
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/27076
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.journalApplied Psycholinguistics
dc.relation.projectIDUiT Norges arktiske universitet: 2062165en_US
dc.relation.projectIDTromsø forskningsstiftelse: HeLPiNGen_US
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2022 The Author(s)en_US
dc.titleMonolingual comparative normativity in bilingualism research is out of “control”: Arguments and alternativesen_US
dc.type.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel