Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorRee, Anne Hansen
dc.contributor.authorMælandsmo, Gunhild Mari
dc.contributor.authorFlatmark, Kjersti
dc.contributor.authorRussnes, Hege Elisabeth Giercksky
dc.contributor.authorCasteneda, Monica Gomez
dc.contributor.authorAas, Eline
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-26T09:19:04Z
dc.date.available2022-10-26T09:19:04Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-09
dc.description.abstractBackground: Precision cancer medicine (PCM), frequently used for the expensive and often modestly efficacious off-label treatment with medications matched to the tumour genome of end-stage cancer, challenges healthcare resources. We compared the health effects, costs and cost-effectiveness of our MetAction PCM study with corresponding data from comparator populations given best supportive care (BSC) in two external randomised controlled trials.<p> <p>Methods: We designed three partitioned survival models to evaluate the healthcare costs and qualityadjusted life years (QALYs) as the main outcomes. Cost-effectiveness was calculated as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of PCM relative to BSC with an annual willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of EUR 56,384 (NOK 605,000). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses addressed uncertainty. <p>Results: We estimated total healthcare costs (relating to next-generation sequencing (NGS) equipment and personnel wages, molecularly matched medications to the patients with an actionable tumour target and follow-up of the responding patients) and the health outcomes for the MetAction patients versus costs (relating to estimated hospital admission) and outcomes for the BSC cases. The ICERs for incremental QALYs were twice or more as high as the WTP threshold and relatively insensitive to cost decrease of the NGS procedures, while reduction of medication prices would contribute significantly towards a cost-effective PCM strategy. <p>Conclusions: The models suggested that the high ICERs of PCM were driven by costs of the NGS diagnostics and molecularly matched medications, with a likelihood for the strategy to be cost-effective defying WTP constraints. Reducing drug expenses to half the list price would likely result in an ICER at the WTP threshold. This can be an incentive for a public-private partnership for sharing drug costs in PCM, exemplified by ongoing European initiatives.en_US
dc.identifier.citationRee AH, Mælandsmo GM, Flatmark K, Russnes HE, Casteneda, Aas E. Cost-effectiveness of molecularly matched off-label therapies for end-stage cancer–the MetAction precision medicine study. Acta Oncologica. 2022;61(8):955-962en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 2056276
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/0284186X.2022.2098053
dc.identifier.issn0284-186X
dc.identifier.issn1651-226X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/27136
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.relation.journalActa Oncologica
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2022 The Author(s)en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)en_US
dc.titleCost-effectiveness of molecularly matched off-label therapies for end-stage cancer–the MetAction precision medicine studyen_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Med mindre det står noe annet, er denne innførselens lisens beskrevet som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)