Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorVasskog, Terje
dc.contributor.advisorØstnes Hansen, Kine
dc.contributor.advisorHolst Hansen, Espen
dc.contributor.authorAntonsen, Magnus Andersland
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-23T05:36:45Z
dc.date.available2023-06-23T05:36:45Z
dc.date.issued2023-05-14en
dc.description.abstractBackground: In a project at UiT - the Arctic University of Norway, the lipid profile of the microalgal biomass from the specie Porosira glacialis is mapped using HRMS lipidomic analyses to evaluate the potential for the biomass to be used as fish feed. At the same time, it is desired to screen the same biomass for bioactivities using bioassays in combination with HRMS metabolomic analyses. The two processes use two different extraction methods. To evaluate the differences between the extraction methods, a comparison between one of each extract was done in this thesis. Fractions from extracts are also tested for bioactivity and analysed on HRMS to initiate the mapping of bioactivity. Method: Microalgal biomass of P. glacialis was extracted using two different extraction methods, yielding an aqueous, an organic and a lipid extract. The metabolic and lipidomic profile of the organic and the lipid extract was compared using HRMS metabolomic and lipidomic analyses. The aqueous and the organic extracts were fractionated using flash chromatography, before being tested for various bioactivities and analysed using HRMS. Observed activity was investigated and a potential bioactive compound was isolated and tested for anti-cancer activity. Results: There were no obvious differences in the metabolomic and lipidomic profiles between the organic and the lipid extracts, but some trends could be observed. The lipidomic analyses showed low lipid detection not consistent with previous research, which needs further investigation. In fractions obtained from the microalgal biomass from P. glacialis, anticancer activity against human melanoma A2058 cancer cells and growth inhibition against the bacteria Streptococcus agalactiae were observed, as well as anti-inflammatory activity in an ELISA immunoassay. An isolated potential bioactive compound showed no activity against human melanoma A2058 cancer cells at five different test concentrations. Conclusion: None of the extraction methods can be considered favourable over the other based on the comparison in this thesis. Various bioactivities were observed for fractions derived from the microalgal biomass of P. glacialis, but more investigation must be done to identify the compounds responsible for the activity.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/29467
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUiT Norges arktiske universitetno
dc.publisherUiT The Arctic University of Norwayen
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2023 The Author(s)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)en_US
dc.subject.courseIDFAR-3911
dc.subjectVDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Kjemi: 440::Analytisk kjemi: 445en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Mathematics and natural science: 400::Chemistry: 440::Analytical chemistry: 445en_US
dc.subjectPorosira Glacialisen_US
dc.subjectMass Spectrometryen_US
dc.titleMass Spectrometry Based Metabolomic and Lipidomic Analyses of Algal Biomass.en_US
dc.typeMastergradsoppgaveno
dc.typeMaster thesisen


File(s) in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)