Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorClay, Patricia M
dc.contributor.authorFerretti, Johanna
dc.contributor.authorBailey, Jennifer L.
dc.contributor.authorGoti, Leyre
dc.contributor.authorDankel, Dorothy Jane
dc.contributor.authorSanturtun, Marina
dc.contributor.authorFuller, Jessica Leyla
dc.contributor.authorLinke, Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Jörn
dc.contributor.authorNielsen, Kåre Nolde
dc.contributor.authorGoldsborough, David
dc.contributor.authorGroeneveld, Rolf
dc.contributor.authorFraga, Ana Rita
dc.contributor.authorElegbede, Isa
dc.contributor.authorRöckmann, Christine
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-06T09:11:51Z
dc.date.available2023-09-06T09:11:51Z
dc.date.issued2023-05-23
dc.description.abstractWith increasing activities of multiple sectors in marine spaces, management of marine social–ecological systems requires more holistic approaches. Adopting such an approach, however, presents difficult institutional and disciplinary challenges. Here, we use the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) as a case study on the implementation of ecosystem-based management (EBM) and integrated ecosystem assessments (IEAs). ICES includes EBM and IEAs in its Science Priorities and established IEA Working Groups (WGs) to carry out regional IEAs. But to what degree does this IEA WG work follow best practices? We examine policy documents, academic literature, and interview data from chairs of all IEA WGs. Results indicate mixed success. All groups acknowledge the holistic goals of IEA, and many use the IEA model as laid out by Levin et al. However, we found a significant variation in the degree to which the full model is applied. We identified two primary areas for improvement: (1) integration of social and economic issues and (2) involvement of stakeholders. We offer examples of how WGs have been making progress towards full IEAs, discuss how ICES can further support this transition, and suggest lessons with respect to the adoption of EBM and IEAs more broadly.en_US
dc.identifier.citationClay, Ferretti, Bailey, Goti, Dankel, Santurtun, Fuller, Linke, Schmidt, Nielsen, Goldsborough, Groeneveld, Fraga, Elegbede, Röckmann. Implementation of integrated ecosystem assessments in the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea - Conceptualizations, practice, and progress. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 2023;80(5):1516-1528en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 2169551
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/icesjms/fsad079
dc.identifier.issn1054-3139
dc.identifier.issn1095-9289
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/30723
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.relation.journalICES Journal of Marine Science
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2023 The Author(s)en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)en_US
dc.titleImplementation of integrated ecosystem assessments in the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea - Conceptualizations, practice, and progressen_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Med mindre det står noe annet, er denne innførselens lisens beskrevet som Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)