Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLeinonen, Kaisa Marika
dc.contributor.authorLeinonen, Jukka
dc.contributor.authorBolstad, Napat Limchaichana
dc.contributor.authorTanner, Tarja
dc.contributor.authorAl-Haroni, Mohammed Hasan Hussein
dc.contributor.authorJohnsen, Jan Are Kolset
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-19T08:11:02Z
dc.date.available2023-12-19T08:11:02Z
dc.date.issued2023-09-23
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aims of this randomised controlled laboratory trial were to determine the procedure time and immediate quality (surface porosity and marginal gaps) of fillings placed using the bulk-fill base technique and the conventional incremental technique in simulated clinical settings.<p> <p>Methods: Forty-two dentists and dental students were randomly allocated to use either the bulk-fill base technique or the conventional incremental technique to fill an identical class II disto-occlusal cavity in a maxillary left first molar typodont tooth. We recorded the time the participants used to fill the cavity and evaluated the surface porosity and marginal gaps on the approximal surfaces of the fillings using a stereomicroscope and specific probes according to the FDI criteria for restoration evaluation. Data were analysed using the Mann–Whitney U, Kruskal–Wallis, and chi-square tests. <p>Results: The median time ± interquartile range was 186 ± 80 s for the bulk-fill base technique and 463 ± 156 s for the conventional incremental technique (p < 0.001). The quality of the fillings was better for the bulk-fill base technique than for the conventional incremental technique (X<sup>2</sup> = 9.5, p = 0.002). Neither operator experience nor the usual technique of choice were associated with the procedure time or the quality of the fillings. <p>Conclusions: Compared to the conventional incremental technique, the use of the bulk-fill base technique shortened the time to fill a cavity by 59.8 % or 4 min and 36 s, and it improved the immediate surface and marginal quality of the fillings, regardless of the operator’s experience or technique preference. <p>Clinical significance: The use of the bulk-fill base technique instead of the conventional incremental technique leads to significant time-savings when placing large class II composite fillings. Additionally, the use of the bulkfill base technique instead of the conventional incremental technique improves the immediate quality of large class II composite fillings.en_US
dc.identifier.citationLeinonen, Leinonen, Bolstad, Tanner, Al-Haroni, Johnsen. Procedure time and filling quality for bulk-fill base and conventional incremental composite techniques—A randomised controlled in vitro trial. Journal of Dentistry. 2023;138en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 2181362
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104725
dc.identifier.issn0300-5712
dc.identifier.issn1879-176X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/32153
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Dentistry
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2023 The Author(s)en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)en_US
dc.titleProcedure time and filling quality for bulk-fill base and conventional incremental composite techniques—A randomised controlled in vitro trialen_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


File(s) in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)