dc.contributor.author | Kristensen, Elise Karoline | |
dc.contributor.author | Müller, Kay | |
dc.contributor.author | Ingebrigtsen, Tor | |
dc.contributor.author | Lindekleiv, Haakon | |
dc.contributor.author | Kloster, Roar | |
dc.contributor.author | Isaksen, Jørgen Gjernes | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-05T08:33:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-05T08:33:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-12-30 | |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: Studies report rates of treatment-requiring postoperative intracranial haemorrhage after craniotomy
around 1–2%, but do not distinguish between supratentorial and posterior fossa operations. Reports about
intracranial haemorrhages’ temporal occurrence show conflicting results. Recommendations for duration of
postoperative monitoring vary.
Research question: To determine the rate, temporal pattern and clinical presentation of reoperation-requiring
postoperative intracranial posterior fossa haemorrhage.
Material and methods: This retrospective case-series identified cases operated with posterior fossa craniotomy or
craniectomy between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2021 by an electronic search in the patient administrative database, and collected data about patient- and treatment-characteristics, postoperative monitoring, and
the occurrence of haemorrhagic and other serious postoperative complications.
Results: We included 62 (n = 34, 55% women) cases with mean age 48 (interquartile range 50) years operated for
tumours (n = 34, 55%), Chiari malformations (n = 18, 29%), ischemic stroke (n = 6, 10%) and other lesions (n
= 3, 5%). One (2%) 66-year-old woman who was a daily smoker operated with decompressive craniectomy and
infarct resection, developed a reoperation-requiring postoperative intracranial haemorrhage after 25.5 h. In four
(6%) cases, other serious complications requiring reoperation or transfer from the post anaesthesia care unit or
regular bed wards to the intensive care unit occurred after 0.5, 6, 9 and 54 h, respectively.
Discussion and conclusion: Treatment-requiring postoperative intracranial haemorrhage and other serious complications after posterior fossa craniotomies occur over a wide timespan and are difficult to capture with a
standardized postoperative monitoring time. This indicates that the duration of monitoring should be individualized based on assessment of risk factors. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Kristensen, Müller, Ingebrigtsen, Lindekleiv, Kloster, Isaksen. Reoperation-requiring postoperative intracranial haemorrhage after posterior fossa craniotomy: Retrospective case-series. Brain and Spine. 2024;4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 2244387 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.bas.2023.102741 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2772-5294 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/34521 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Brain and Spine | |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright 2024 The Author(s) | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) | en_US |
dc.title | Reoperation-requiring postoperative intracranial haemorrhage after posterior fossa craniotomy: Retrospective case-series | en_US |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |