Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorWien, Charlotte
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-07T11:53:01Z
dc.date.available2024-10-07T11:53:01Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-09
dc.description.abstractBlind peer review has become the gold standard of many scholarly disciplines. However, this seems like a paradox since openness is deeply embedded in the DNA of research. Over the last 30 years changes in the managerial paradigms of academia have also induced so many changes in the ecosystem of scholarly communication that many scholars describe the present situation as a crisis. Therefore, in light of the availability of new technologies and the changes in the scholarly communication ecosystems, it might be time to review how we assess research quality and address the paradox of the blindness of peer review.en_US
dc.identifier.citationWien. Is Living Easier with Eyes Closed?. European Review. 2024en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 2248151
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S1062798723000558
dc.identifier.issn1062-7987
dc.identifier.issn1474-0575
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/35087
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.relation.journalEuropean Review
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2024 The Author(s)en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)en_US
dc.titleIs Living Easier with Eyes Closed?en_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Med mindre det står noe annet, er denne innførselens lisens beskrevet som Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)