Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBogsrud, Trond
dc.contributor.authorEngelsen, Ola
dc.contributor.authorLu, Thi Thu Thuy
dc.contributor.authorStensvold, Andreas
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Derek R.
dc.contributor.authorBurkett, Brian J.
dc.contributor.authorKendi, Ayse Tuba
dc.contributor.authorPandey, Mukesh K.
dc.contributor.authorSundset, Rune
dc.contributor.authorDurski, Jolanta M.
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-13T07:39:01Z
dc.date.available2024-11-13T07:39:01Z
dc.date.issued2024-10-15
dc.description.abstractBackground The main objective is to discuss why treatment of non-prostate cancers with [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMAradioligand achieved only low tumor dose in most published cases, despite high uptake on PSMA PET. We use a patient with renal cell carcinoma as an illustrative example. Furthermore, we discuss how the problem with early washout and low tumor dose might be overcome by using a radionuclide with shorter half-life, matching the target binding residence time.<p> <p>Case presentation [ <sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT of a 56-year old man with metastatic renal cell carcinoma showed high lesion uptake. One dose of 6.9 GBq [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T was administrated. Post-therapy dosimetry was performed with SPECT/CT and whole-body planar imaging after 5, 24 and 48 h. Doses to target lesions were only 0.2–0.5 Gy. No treatment effect was achieved. <p>Conclusion Rapid tumor washout of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T and low tumor dose despite high uptake of [<sup>68</sup>Ga] Ga-PSMA-11 are most likely caused by localization of PSMA-receptors on neovasculature rather than on the tumor cells, and unlike in prostate cancer cells, the PSMA-RL / PSMA-receptor complex is not internalized. To overcome the problem with early washout, the use of a radionuclide with shorter half-life matching the target binding residence time will be needed.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBogsrud, Engelsen, Lu, Stensvold, Johnson, Burkett, Kendi, Pandey, Sundset, Durski. All that glitters is not gold: high uptake on PSMA PET in non-prostate cancers does not mean that treatment with [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-radioligand will be successful. EJNMMI Research. 2024;14(1)en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 2318269
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13550-024-01156-9
dc.identifier.issn2191-219X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/35672
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.relation.journalEJNMMI Research
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2024 The Author(s)en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)en_US
dc.titleAll that glitters is not gold: high uptake on PSMA PET in non-prostate cancers does not mean that treatment with [<177Lu]Lu-PSMA-radioligand will be successfulen_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


File(s) in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)