dc.contributor.author | Newman, Thomas | |
dc.contributor.author | Stroeve, Julienne C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Nandan, Vishnu | |
dc.contributor.author | Willatt, Rosemary C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Mead, James B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Mallett, Robbie David Christopher | |
dc.contributor.author | Tsamados, Michel | |
dc.contributor.author | Huntemann, Marcus | |
dc.contributor.author | Hendricks, Stefan | |
dc.contributor.author | Spreen, Gunnar | |
dc.contributor.author | Tonboe, Rasmus T. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-08T10:13:57Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-01-08T10:13:57Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-11-19 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper presents a practical step-by-step approach to Frequency Modulated Continuous
Wave (FMCW) radar nonlinearity correction (deconvolution), utilizing surface-based Ku- and Ka-band radar
data collected over nilas ice within a newly-opened sea ice lead during the 2019/2020 MOSAiC expedition.
Two performance metrics are introduced to evaluate deconvolution effectiveness: the spurious free dynamic
range (SFDR), which quantifies sidelobe suppression, and the leading edge width (LEW), which quantifies
the improvement in surface return clarity. The impact of deconvolution waveforms on different survey dates,
radar polarizations, and surface types is examined using echograms and quantitative metrics. Deconvolution
results in a maximum SFDR increase of 28 dB, with a maximum 3 dB decline in deconvolution performance
observed over an 8-day period and a maximum decline of 15 dB observed over a 71-day period. The
LEW values indicate that the effectiveness of deconvolution in enhancing interface clarity depends on
the combination of pre-deconvolution sidelobe shape, prominence of the surface return, the influence of
snowpack returns, as well as a time-dependent reduction in deconvolution performance. Deconvolution
significantly improves surface return clarity for cross-polarized radar data, where weak surface returns are
obscured by returns from within the snowpack. The results demonstrate that deconvolution performance is
most effective shortly after deconvolution waveform characterization. Therefore, it is recommended to perform at least weekly calibrations using a large metal sheet and ideally calibration before/after data collection to
ensure optimal deconvolution performance and effective sidelobe suppression. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Newman, Stroeve, Nandan, Willatt, Mead, Mallett, Tsamados, Huntemann, Hendricks, Spreen, Tonboe. A Practical Approach to FMCW Radar Deconvolution in the Sea Ice Domain. IEEE Access. 2024;12:174901-174933 | en_US |
dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 2332153 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3502502 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2169-3536 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/36109 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | IEEE | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | IEEE Access | |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/101003826/EU/Climate relevant interactions and feedbacks: the key role of sea ice and snow in the polar and global climate system/CRiceS/ | en_US |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright 2024 The Author(s) | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) | en_US |
dc.title | A Practical Approach to FMCW Radar Deconvolution in the Sea Ice Domain | en_US |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |