Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLaine, Katariina
dc.contributor.authorSkjeldestad, Finn Egil
dc.contributor.authorSandvik, Leiv
dc.contributor.authorStaff, Anne Cathrine
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-11T09:43:08Z
dc.date.available2013-03-11T09:43:08Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.description.abstractObjective To compare the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) in two time periods, before and after implementing a training programme for improved perineal support aimed at reducing the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries. The secondary aim was to study incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in subgroups defined by risk factors for OASIS. Design Population-based cohort study. Setting University hospital setting in Oslo, Norway. Participants Two cohorts of all delivering women in the largest hospital in Norway during two time periods (2003–2005 and 2008–2010) were studied. After excluding caesarean sections and preterm deliveries (< week 32), the study population consisted of 31 709 deliveries, among which 907 women were identified with obstetric anal sphincter injury. Primary and secondary outcome measures Incidence of OASIS in two time periods. Maternal, obstetrical and foetal risk factors for OASIS were collected from the hospital obstetric database. Univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression analyses, presenting adjusted ODs for OASIS, were performed. Results The OASIS incidence was significantly reduced by 50%, from 4% (591/14787) in the first time period to 1.9% (316/16 922) in the second. This reduction could not be explained by changes in population characteristics or OASIS risk factors during the study years. The reduction of incidence of OASIS between the two study periods was consistent across subgroups of women; regardless of parity, delivery method and infant birth weight. Conclusions A marked reduction in the incidence of OASIS was observed in all studied subgroups of women after implementing the training programme for perineal protection. Further, this reduction could not be explained by the differences in patient characteristics across the study period. These findings indicate that the training programme with improved perineal protection markedly reduced the risk of OASIS.en
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Open (2012), vol.2:e001649en
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 981775
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001649
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/4938
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-uit_munin_4660
dc.language.isoengen
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.subjectVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Clinical medical disciplines: 750::Gynecology and obstetrics: 756en
dc.subjectVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Klinisk medisinske fag: 750::Gynekologi og obstetrikk: 756en
dc.titleIncidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries after training to protect the perineum: cohort studyen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen
dc.typePeer revieweden


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel