Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAugestad, Knut Magne
dc.contributor.authorNorum, Jan
dc.contributor.authorDehof, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorAspevik, Ranveig
dc.contributor.authorRingberg, Unni
dc.contributor.authorNestvold, Torunn Kristin
dc.contributor.authorVonen, Barthold
dc.contributor.authorSkrøvseth, Stein Olav
dc.contributor.authorLindsetmo, Rolv-Ole
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-16T09:47:17Z
dc.date.available2013-12-16T09:47:17Z
dc.date.issued2013-04-04
dc.description.abstractObjective: To assess whether colon cancer follow-up can be organised by general practitioners (GPs) without a decline in the patient's quality of life (QoL) and increase in cost or time to cancer diagnoses, compared to hospital follow-up. Design: Randomised controlled trial. Setting: Northern Norway Health Authority Trust, 4 trusts, 11 hospitals and 88 local communities. Participants: Patients surgically treated for colon cancer, hospital surgeons and community GPs. Intervention: 24-month follow-up according to national guidelines at the community GP office. To ensure a high follow-up guideline adherence, a decision support tool for patients and GPs were used. Main outcome measures: Primary outcomes were QoL, measured by the global health scales of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ C-30) and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D). Secondary outcomes were cost-effectiveness and time to cancer diagnoses. Results: 110 patients were randomised to intervention (n=55) or control (n=55), and followed by 78 GPs (942 follow-up months) and 70 surgeons (942 follow-up months), respectively. Compared to baseline, there was a significant improvement in postoperative QoL (p=0.003), but no differences between groups were revealed (mean difference at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24-month follow-up appointments): Global Health; Δ−2.23, p=0.20; EQ-5D index; Δ−0.10, p=0.48, EQ-5D VAS; Δ−1.1, p=0.44. There were no differences in time to recurrent cancer diagnosis (GP 35 days vs surgeon 45 days, p=0.46); 14 recurrences were detected (GP 6 vs surgeon 8) and 7 metastases surgeries performed (GP 3 vs surgeon 4). The follow-up programme initiated 1186 healthcare contacts (GP 678 vs surgeon 508), 1105 diagnostic tests (GP 592 vs surgeon 513) and 778 hospital travels (GP 250 vs surgeon 528). GP organised follow-up was associated with societal cost savings (£8233 vs £9889, p<0.001). Conclusions: GP-organised follow-up was associated with no decline in QoL, no increase in time to recurrent cancer diagnosis and cost savings.en
dc.descriptionThe accepted manuscript version of this article is part of Knut Magne Augestad's PhD thesis, which is available in Munin at <a href=http://hdl.handle.net/10037/5167>http://hdl.handle.net/10037/5167</a>en
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Open 3(2013) nr. 4 :e002391en
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 1022754
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002391
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/5641
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-uit_munin_5330
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherBMJ Openen
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.subjectVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Clinical medical disciplines: 750::Oncology: 762en
dc.subjectVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Klinisk medisinske fag: 750::Onkologi: 762en
dc.titleCost-effectiveness and quality of life in surgeon versus general practitioner-organised colon cancer surveillance: a randomised controlled trialen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen
dc.typePeer revieweden


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel