Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSanchez-Hernandez, Javier
dc.contributor.authorCobo, Fernando
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-17T08:21:22Z
dc.date.available2016-03-17T08:21:22Z
dc.date.issued2015-02-18
dc.description.abstractBackground Brown trout, Salmo trutta Linnaeus, 1758, is a species of significant conservation and socio-economic importance. A consequence of this importance is the enormous amount of literature that has been published on the species in the last few decades. In general terms, brown trout has been considered as a size-selective predator, even though it is able to feed on a wide range of prey sizes. Nevertheless, there are still some gaps in our knowledge, for example the theoretical relationship between prey numbers and prey sizes eaten by the fish need to be addressed. This research aimed to study optimal prey size in the environment (benthos and drift) as well as the potential relationship between prey size and two other feeding variables (prey numbers and stomach fullness). Additionally, ontogenetic shifts in these variables were addressed. Results Brown trout showed a clear preference for 4- to 6-mm-length prey, although the use of prey larger than 10-mm length may be feasible. The similarity of the prey size frequency distribution between the environment (benthos and drift) and the diet in some cases was considerable (from 57.7% to 95.9%). Moreover, the results revealed that the feeding strategy can be related to prey size and the numbers of prey eaten by the brown trout; as food size decreased, prey numbers increased. On the contrary, the correlation between the average prey size and fish length was positive but statistically nonsignificant. A significant ontogenetic shift, in terms of prey size sorted by age classes, was found in only two of eight studied populations. No clear relationship between prey size and stomach fullness was found. Conclusions The feeding strategy of this species is flexible and clearly influenced by the size frequency distribution of potential prey: trout fed on either small numbers of large prey or large numbers of small, and theoretically low energy, prey. Our approach covers a general subject in trophic ecology and animal behaviour that may be applicable to other fish species to improve our understanding of predator feeding behaviour.en_US
dc.descriptionAccepted manuscript version. The final publication is available at Springer via <a href=http://doi.org/10.1186/s40555-015-0107-x>http://doi.org/10.1186/s40555-015-0107-x</a>.en_US
dc.identifier.citationZoological Studies 2015, 54(26):1-9en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 1292208
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s40555-015-0107-x
dc.identifier.issn1810-522X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/8994
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-uit_munin_8591
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.subjectTrophic ecologyen_US
dc.subjectForaging behaviouren_US
dc.subjectFlexible behaviouren_US
dc.subjectSalmo truttaen_US
dc.subjectPrey sizeen_US
dc.subjectAvailable preyen_US
dc.subjectBenthosen_US
dc.subjectDriften_US
dc.subjectVDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Zoologiske og botaniske fag: 480en_US
dc.titleAdaptive flexibility in the feeding behaviour of brown trout: optimal prey sizeen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel