ub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.muninLogoub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.openResearchArchiveLogo
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Velg spraakEnglish 
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Administration/UB
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for naturvitenskap og teknologi
  • Institutt for teknologi og sikkerhet
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (teknologi og sikkerhet)
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for naturvitenskap og teknologi
  • Institutt for teknologi og sikkerhet
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (teknologi og sikkerhet)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Human reliability assessment (HRA) in maintenance of production process: A case study

Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/10382
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-016-0453-z
Thumbnail
View/Open
article.pdf (367.9Kb)
(PDF)
Date
2016-04-02
Type
Journal article
Tidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed

Author
Aalipour, Mojgan; Ayele, Yonas Zewdu; Barabadi, Abbas
Abstract
Human reliability makes a considerable contribution to the maintenance performance, safety, and cost-efficiency of any production process. To improve human reliability, the causes of human errors should be identified and the probability of human errors should be quantified. Analysis of human error is very case-specific; the context of the field should be taken into account. The aim of this study is to identify the causes of human errors and improve human reliability in maintenance activities in the cable manufacturing industry. The central thrust of this paper is to employ the three most common HRA techniques—human error assessment and reduction technique, standardized plant analysis risk-human reliability, and Bayesian network—for estimating human error probabilities and then to check the consistency of the results obtained. The case study results demonstrated that the main causes of human error during maintenance activities are time pressure, lack of experience, and poor procedure. Moreover, the probabilities of human error, obtained by employing the three techniques, are similar and consistent.
Description
Manuscript. Published version available in International Journal of Systems Assurance Engineering and Management. 2016;7(2):229-238
Publisher
Springer
Citation
Aalipour, M., Ayele, Y.Z. & Barabadi, A. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag (2016) 7: 229. doi:10.1007/s13198-016-0453-z
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (teknologi og sikkerhet) [361]

Browse

Browse all of MuninCommunities & CollectionsAuthor listTitlesBy Issue DateBrowse this CollectionAuthor listTitlesBy Issue Date
Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
UiT

Munin is powered by DSpace

UiT The Arctic University of Norway
The University Library
uit.no/ub - munin@ub.uit.no

Accessibility statement (Norwegian only)