dc.contributor.author | Ambur, Ole Herman | |
dc.contributor.author | Engelstädter, Jan | |
dc.contributor.author | Johnsen, Pål Jarle | |
dc.contributor.author | Miller, Eric L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Rozen, Daniel E. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-03-08T16:11:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-03-08T16:11:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-09-12 | |
dc.description.abstract | Many bacteria are highly sexual, but the reasons for their promiscuity
remain obscure. Did bacterial sex evolve to maximize diversity and facilitate
adaptation in a changing world, or does it instead help to retain the bacterial
functions that work right now? In other words, is bacterial sex innovative or
conservative? Our aim in this review is to integrate experimental, bioinformatic
and theoretical studies to critically evaluate these alternatives, with
a main focus on natural genetic transformation, the bacterial equivalent
of eukaryotic sexual reproduction. First, we provide a general overview of
several hypotheses that have been put forward to explain the evolution of
transformation. Next, we synthesize a large body of evidence highlighting
the numerous passive and active barriers to transformation that have
evolved to protect bacteria from foreign DNA, thereby increasing the likelihood
that transformation takes place among clonemates. Our critical review
of the existing literature provides support for the view that bacterial transformation
is maintained as a means of genomic conservation that provides
direct benefits to both individual bacterial cells and to transformable bacterial
populations. We examine the generality of this view across bacteria
and contrast this explanation with the different evolutionary roles proposed
to maintain sex in eukaryotes.
This article is part of the themed issue ‘Weird sex: the underappreciated
diversity of sexual reproduction’. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Support for this work was provided by the NWO (Dutch
Science Foundation) and the BBSRC (UK) to D.E.R. and E.L.M.; by
the Australian Research Council through a Future Fellowship
(FT140100907) to J.E. and by grants from the Norwegian Research
Council (project number 204263) and the Northern Norway Regional
Health Authority to P.J.J. | en_US |
dc.description | Published version. Source at <a href=http://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0528>http://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0528</a>.
License <a href=https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/>CC BY 4.0</a>. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Ambur OH, Engelstädter J, Johnsen Pj, Miller EL, Rozen. Steady at the wheel: Conservative sex and the benefits of bacterial transformation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Biological Sciences. 2016;371:20150528(1706) | en_US |
dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 1394486 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1098/rstb.2015.0528 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0962-8436 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1471-2970 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/10493 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | The Royal Society | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Biological Sciences | |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/RCN//204263/Norway/// | en_US |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | transformation | en_US |
dc.subject | bacterial sex | en_US |
dc.subject | natural competence | en_US |
dc.subject | VDP::Mathematics and natural science: 400::Basic biosciences: 470 | en_US |
dc.title | Steady at the wheel: Conservative sex and the benefits of bacterial transformation | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |