| dc.contributor.author | Sydnes, Are K. |  | 
| dc.contributor.author | Sydnes, Maria |  | 
| dc.contributor.author | Antonsen, Yngve |  | 
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-11-11T10:44:20Z |  | 
| dc.date.available | 2017-11-11T10:44:20Z |  | 
| dc.date.issued | 2017-09 |  | 
| dc.description.abstract | SAR in the Arctic is a complex and dynamic cross-disciplinary activity that requires the combined
effort of multiple actors with specialized human and technical resources. Due to limited resources
and infrastructure in the Arctic, international cooperation is particularly important. This article
applies a conceptual framework drawn from regime-theory to study SAR cooperation in the Arctic.
More  specifically,  we  apply  the  three  dimensions  of  regime  effectiveness  (outputs,  outcomes
and  impacts)  to  examine  the  regimes  established  by  the  2011  Arctic  SAR  Agreement  and  the
1995 Barents SAR Agreement. The study addresses the rights and duties established by the regimes
and  their  institutional  arrangements  for  cooperation.  Further,  it  investigates  the  importance
of  operational  cooperation  among  response  agencies  in  understanding  the  development  and
effectiveness  of  the  regimes.  The  study  concludes  that  the  Arctic  SAR  regime  is  still  under
implementation. The agreement has entered into force but a series of steps needs to be taken for the
common  SAR  system  to  be  operative.  Consequently,  the  regime  is  in  the  early  stages  of
development and any evaluations of its impact are premature. The parties have implemented the
Barents SAR regime both formally and in practice. Though the regime is generally held to have a
positive effect on cooperation between the parties, there is a range of challenges that raise questions
regarding its capacity to provide for a coordinated and effective joint SAR operation. The study
further  concludes  that  treating  regime  effectiveness  in  terms  of  a  causal  link  between  output,
outcome and impact should be done with caution. It also argues that the focus of regime theory on
interest-based decision-making among regime parties should be supplemented by investigating the
operative and informal aspects of cooperation. | en_US | 
| dc.description | Source at <a href=https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v8.705> https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v8.705 </a> | en_US | 
| dc.identifier.citation | Sydnes A, Sydnes M, Antonsen Y. International Cooperation on Search and Rescue in the Arctic. Arctic Review on Law and Politics. 2017;8:109-136 | en_US | 
| dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 1496888 |  | 
| dc.identifier.issn | 1891-6252 |  | 
| dc.identifier.issn | 2387-4562 |  | 
| dc.identifier.other | /10.23865/arctic.v8.705 |  | 
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/11729 |  | 
| dc.language.iso | eng | en_US | 
| dc.publisher | Nordic Open Access Scholarly Publishing | en_US | 
| dc.relation.journal | Arctic Review on Law and Politics |  | 
| dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | en_US | 
| dc.subject | VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Statsvitenskap og organisasjonsteori: 240::Offentlig og privat administrasjon: 242 | en_US | 
| dc.subject | VDP::Social science: 200::Political science and organizational theory: 240::Public and private administration: 242 | en_US | 
| dc.title | International Cooperation on Search and Rescue in the Arctic | en_US | 
| dc.type | Journal article | en_US | 
| dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en_US | 
| dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |