Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorStangvaltaite, Lina
dc.contributor.advisorWold Nilsen, Bo
dc.contributor.authorVakulenko, Ivan
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-21T08:12:36Z
dc.date.available2019-05-21T08:12:36Z
dc.date.issued2018-05-20
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background: Class-V fillings are thought as a demanding type of dental restorations having a sufficient risk of falling out and discoloration during follow-up. Porosity, among other factors, is described in the literature as an undesirable property of dental materials contributing to the development of secondary caries and reduction of the filling strength. Objectivities: To evaluate a percentage amount of porosity in 5 restorative materials indicated to Class-V fillings. Material and methods: fifteen humans extracted wisdom teeth were sectioned into 4 parts and prepared standard class-V cavities restored with five different restorative materials (GC Fuji IX GP® EXTRA Japan, GC Fuji II LC® Japan, Ceram.x® Dentsply Sirona Germany, Tetric EvoFlow Ivoclar Vivadent Lichtenstein, SDR® flow+Bulk Densply Sirona Germany). The porosity of Class-V restorations was tested using micro-computed tomography (SkyScan 1272 Bruker, Germany). The detected porosities were calculated and analyzed as a percentage value of total, closed and open porosity. The ANOVA on ranks test with Turkey post-hoc test was done to compare the differences in the median values among materials. A t-test or a Mann-Whitney Rank sum test were performed after a Shapiro-Wilk normality test to compare total, open and closed porosities within material groups. The results: Significant difference was detected in each group when comparing glass-ionomers (Fuji Extra, Fuji IX) with resin-based composites (Ceram X, Tetric EvoFlow, SDR) in respect to total and closed porosity. When assessing open porosity, the significant difference was found between Fuji Extra and resin-based composites (Ceram X, Tetric EvoFlow, SDR) as well as between Fuji LC and Tetric EvoFlow. Conclusion: This project reveals that in spite of the distinctive amount of porosity detected for each type of material, the significant difference is presented only between the representatives of the group of glass ionomer and composite.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/15338
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUiT Norges arktiske universiteten_US
dc.publisherUiT The Arctic University of Norwayen_US
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2018 The Author(s)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)en_US
dc.subject.courseIDODO-3901
dc.subjectVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Clinical dentistry disciplines: 830::Preservative dental care: 831en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Klinisk odontologiske fag: 830::Konserverende tannpleie: 831en_US
dc.subjectPorosityen_US
dc.subjectVoidsen_US
dc.subjectGlass-ionomeren_US
dc.subjectMicro-CTen_US
dc.subjectBulk-flowen_US
dc.subjectClass-V restorationen_US
dc.subjectNon-carious lesionen_US
dc.titlePorosities in dental restorative materials indicated for class-V cavities – a micro-computed tomography based analysis.en_US
dc.typeMaster thesisen_US
dc.typeMastergradsoppgaveen_US


File(s) in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)