ub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.muninLogoub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.openResearchArchiveLogo
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Velg spraakEnglish 
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Administration/UB
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Universitetsbiblioteket
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (UB)
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Universitetsbiblioteket
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (UB)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Perceived quality and self-identity in scholarly publishing

Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/17262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24235
Thumbnail
View/Open
article.pdf (454.8Kb)
Accepted manuscript version (PDF)
Date
2019-04-11
Type
Journal article
Tidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed

Author
Moksness, Lars; Olsen, Svein Ottar
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to understand if and how 2 proposed facets of self‐identity (work‐self and career‐self) and journals' perceived quality (impact, visibility, and content quality) influence and explain the intention to publish in open access (OA) or nonopen access (non‐OA) journals. This study integrates attitude and identity theory within a cross‐sectional survey design. The sample consists of about 1,600 researchers in Norway, and the data were collected via e‐mail invitation using a digital surveying tool and analyzed using structural equation modeling techniques. We determined that perceived impact‐quality increases the intention to publish non‐OA, while decreasing the intention to publish OA. Content quality is only associated with non‐OA journals. Perceived visibility increases the intention to publish OA, while the opposite effect is found for non‐OA. Career‐self salience has the strongest effect on impact‐quality, while content quality is most important when work‐self is salient. This research contributes to a deeper understanding about how perceived quality influences intention to publish in OA and non‐OA journals, and how self‐identity salience affects different facets of perceived quality in valence and strength. Findings have implications for policy development, implementation, and assessment and may contribute to improving OA adoption.
Description
This is a postprint of an article published in the Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, available at https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24235.
Publisher
Wiley
Citation
Moksness, L. & Olsen, S.O. (2020). Perceived quality and self‐identity in scholarly publishing. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71, 338-348. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24235
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (UB) [3257]
© 2019 ASIS&T

Browse

Browse all of MuninCommunities & CollectionsAuthor listTitlesBy Issue DateBrowse this CollectionAuthor listTitlesBy Issue Date
Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
UiT

Munin is powered by DSpace

UiT The Arctic University of Norway
The University Library
uit.no/ub - munin@ub.uit.no

Accessibility statement (Norwegian only)