A comparison of face-to-face and online training in improving managers' confidence to support the mental health of workers
Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/17644Date
2019-07-13Type
Journal articleTidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed
Author
Gayed, Aimée; Tan, Leona; LaMontagne, Anthony D.; Milner, Allison; Deady, Mark; Milligan-Saville, Josie S.; Madan, Ira; Calvo, Rafael A.; Christensen, Helen; Mykletun, Arnstein; Glozier, Nicholas; Harvey, Samuel B.Abstract
Aims - This study brings together results from two trials evaluating the same program content, each employing a different mode of content delivery. Both types of training aimed to change managers' confidence to better support the mental health needs of the staff they supervise.
Methods - Utilising data derived from two previously conducted trials, mean change in manager confidence from baseline at both post-intervention and follow-up were examined for each method of content delivery. An identical way of measuring confidence was used in each study.
Results - Managers' confidence improved from baseline with both methods of training. A greater change was observed with face-to-face training than for online, although both methods had sustained improvement over time. Analyses indicate that at follow-up, improvements in confidence were significant for both face-to-face (t18 = 5.99; P < .001) and online training (t39 = 3.85; P < .001). Analyses focused on managers who fully completed either type of training indicated very similar impacts for face-to-face and online training.
Conclusions - Both face-to-face and online delivery of manager mental health training can significantly improve managers’ confidence in supporting the mental health needs of their staff. This change is sustained over various follow-up periods. However, lower retention rates common in online training reduce the relative effect of this method of delivery.