ub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.muninLogoub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.openResearchArchiveLogo
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Velg spraaknorsk 
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Administrasjon/UB
Vis innførsel 
  •   Hjem
  • Det helsevitenskapelige fakultet
  • Institutt for klinisk medisin
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (klinisk medisin)
  • Vis innførsel
  •   Hjem
  • Det helsevitenskapelige fakultet
  • Institutt for klinisk medisin
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (klinisk medisin)
  • Vis innførsel
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Isoflurane increases tolerance to renal ischemia reperfusion injury compared to propofol: An experimental study in pigs

Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/17955
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2019.1637038
Thumbnail
Åpne
article.pdf (941.2Kb)
Akseptert manusversjon (PDF)
Dato
2019-07-09
Type
Journal article
Tidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed

Forfatter
Roaldsen, Marius Håke; Ciosek, Timothy Allan; Richardsen, Elin; Al-Saad, Samer; Patel, Hitendra R.H.; Aarsæther, Erling Johan
Sammendrag
Purpose: To compare two clinically relevant anesthetic agents, i.e., isoflurane versus propofol with respect to protection of the kidney in a porcine renal ischemia reperfusion model.

Materials and Methods: 14 hybrid pigs were randomized to anesthesia with either isoflurane or propofol prior to laparoscopic surgery. Following anesthesia, the left kidney hilum was clamped for 60 min and the right kidney removed. After 48 h of reperfusion, urine was sampled for analysis of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), albumin, and creatinine. The left kidney was harvested for histologic scoring of injury.

Results: Histologic examination of renal injury revealed a statistically significant difference in favor of isoflurane on denuded basement membrane score (isoflurane group 1.58 ± 0.38 vs. propofol 2.42 ± 0.80, p = .026). Median (25–75 percentile) urinary albumin 3.4 g/L (2.25–7.48) vs. 8.9 g/L (3.73–13.8), (p = .041) and urinary albumin/creatinine ratio 1.17 (0.76–1.82) vs. 1.76 (1.63–5.99), (p = .026) were both significantly lower in the isoflurane group. Median (25–75 percentile) urinary NGAL was 167 (51–215) pg/ml in the isoflurane group compared with 362 (149–508) pg/ml in the propofol group (p = .093).

Conclusion: Isoflurane increases tolerance to renal ischemia reperfusion injury compared to propofol in this model.

Beskrivelse
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of investigate surgery on 09 July 2019. Final version including figures, is available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2019.1637038.
Forlag
Taylor & Francis
Sitering
Roaldsen MH, Ciosek TA, Richardsen ER, Al-Saad SAS, Patel HR, Aarsæther EJ. Isoflurane increases tolerance to renal ischemia reperfusion injury compared to propofol: An experimental study in pigs. Journal of investigative surgery. 2019:1-8
Metadata
Vis full innførsel
Samlinger
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (klinisk medisin) [1974]
Copyright © 2019 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

Bla

Bla i hele MuninEnheter og samlingerForfatterlisteTittelDatoBla i denne samlingenForfatterlisteTittelDato
Logg inn

Statistikk

Antall visninger
UiT

Munin bygger på DSpace

UiT Norges Arktiske Universitet
Universitetsbiblioteket
uit.no/ub - munin@ub.uit.no

Tilgjengelighetserklæring