Construal vs. redundancy: Russian aspect in context
Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/18128Date
2019-07-10Type
Journal articleTidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed
Abstract
The relationship between construal and redundancy has not been previously explored empirically. Russian aspect allows speakers to construe situations as either Perfective or Imperfective, but it is not clear to what extent aspect is determined by context and therefore redundant. We investigate the relationship between redundancy and open construal by surveying 501 native Russian speakers who rated the acceptability of both Perfective and Imperfective verb forms in complete extensive authentic contexts. We find that aspect is largely redundant in 81% of uses, and in 17% of contexts aspect is relatively open to construal. We contend that anchoring in redundant contexts likely facilitates the independence of construal in contexts with less redundancy. However further research is needed to discover what makes contexts redundant since known cues for aspect are absent in the majority of such contexts. Native speakers are fairly consistent in giving the original aspect high ratings, but less consistent in rating the non-original aspect, indicating potential problems in testing the reactions of speakers to non-authentic data.
Publisher
De GruyterCitation
Janda LA, Reynolds R. Construal vs. Redundancy: Russian Aspect in Context. Cognitive Linguistics. 2019;30(3):467-497Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Copyright 2019 The Author(s)