Managing chronic illnesses with remote patient monitoring in primary health care
Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/18802Date
2020-03Type
Research reportForskningsrapport
Author
Muller, Ashley Elizabeth; Ormstad, Sari Susanna; Jardim, Patricia; Johansen, Trine Bjerke; Berg, RigmorAbstract
We summarized systematic reviews of a specific type of RPM that the Norwegian Directorate of Health is most interested in: RPM that is occurring in primary health services, in which provider feedback is included, and not including technologies based on internet, mobile, or tablet applications.
We included 11 randomized controlled trials of patients with diabetes and/or hypertension, from four systematic reviews. Patients were on average in their 50s, 60s, or 70s, and roughly one to two of every 20 patients had at least one additional multi-morbidity.
Based on summaries of each outcome and our assessment of the certainty of the evidence, we have drawn the following conclusions:
-
RPM probably makes little to no difference on HbA1c in dia-betic patients (types I and II) and on systolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients.
RPM probably has a small negative effect on the physical component of health-related quality of life.
RPM may make little to no difference to diastolic blood pressure, cholesterol, number of patients needing hospitalizations or emergency stays, and the mental health component of health-related quality of life.
The specific type of RPM we examined in this review does not appear commonly implemented among people with chronic conditions other than diabetes or hypertension. Evidence of its clinical and health care utilization effectiveness is weak.