ub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.muninLogoub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.openResearchArchiveLogo
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Velg spraakEnglish 
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Administration/UB
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Det helsevitenskapelige fakultet
  • Institutt for klinisk medisin
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (klinisk medisin)
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Det helsevitenskapelige fakultet
  • Institutt for klinisk medisin
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (klinisk medisin)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

D-dimer as a stand-alone test to rule out deep vein thrombosis

Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/20889
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2020.04.026
Thumbnail
View/Open
article.pdf (323.5Kb)
(PDF)
Date
2020-04-25
Type
Journal article
Tidsskriftartikkel

Author
Rinde, Fridtjof Balteskard; Frønæs, Synne Grønvold; Ghanima, Waleed Khalid; Vik, Anders; Hansen, John-Bjarne; Brækkan, Sigrid
Abstract
Background - Current guidelines recommend the use of clinical decision rules, such as Wells score, in combination with D-dimer to assess the need for objective imaging to rule out deep vein thrombosis (DVT). However, the clinical decision rule has limitations, and use of D-dimer as a stand-alone test has been suggested.

Objective - We aimed to assess the safety and efficiency of D-dimer as a stand-alone test to rule out DVT in outpatients referred with suspected DVT.

Methods - We collected data from consecutive outpatients referred to our hospital with suspected DVT in 2008–2018. D-dimer levels were analyzed using STA® Liatest® D-Di assay. D-dimer as a stand-alone test was theoretically applied in retrospect, and the number of misdiagnosed events were estimated as if such an approach had been initially used. All patients were followed for three months.

Results - Of 1765 included patients, 293 (16.6%) were diagnosed with DVT. A total of 491 patients (27.8%) had a negative D-dimer (<500 ng/mL). Of these, nine were diagnosed with DVT, yielding a failure rate for D-dimer as a stand-alone test of 1.8% (95% CI 0.8%–3.5%). The majority of the misdiagnosed patients had distal DVT. In analyses restricted to proximal DVTs, the failure rate was 0.6% (95% CI 0.1%–1.8%). D-dimer as a stand-alone approach reduced the proportion of required ultrasounds from 81.8% to 72.2%.

Conclusion - D-dimer as a stand-alone test may be safe for excluding proximal DVT and reduce the proportion of required ultrasounds. Prospective management studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Description
Submitted manuscript version
Is part of
Rinde, F.B. (2023). D-dimer for diagnosis and risk assessment of first and recurrent venous thromboembolism. (Doctoral thesis). https://hdl.handle.net/10037/29270.
Publisher
Elsevier
Citation
Rinde, Frønæs, Ghanima, Vik, Hansen, Brækkan. D-dimer as a stand-alone test to rule out deep vein thrombosis. Thrombosis Research. 2020;191:134-139
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (klinisk medisin) [1974]
Copyright 2020 The Author(s)

Browse

Browse all of MuninCommunities & CollectionsAuthor listTitlesBy Issue DateBrowse this CollectionAuthor listTitlesBy Issue Date
Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
UiT

Munin is powered by DSpace

UiT The Arctic University of Norway
The University Library
uit.no/ub - munin@ub.uit.no

Accessibility statement (Norwegian only)