Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLasabuda, Amando Putra Ersaid
dc.contributor.authorJohansen, Nora
dc.contributor.authorLaberg, Jan Sverre
dc.contributor.authorFaleide, Jan Inge
dc.contributor.authorSenger, Kim
dc.contributor.authorRydningen, Tom Arne
dc.contributor.authorPatton, Henry
dc.contributor.authorKnutsen, Stig-Morten
dc.contributor.authorHanssen, Alfred
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-22T17:40:52Z
dc.date.available2021-04-22T17:40:52Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-23
dc.description.abstractUplift and erosion are complex phenomena in terms of their governing processes, precise timing and exact magnitude. The intricate relationship between different geodynamic processes leading to uplift may increase uncertainties in estimating spatial and temporal patterns. Sediment distribution from uplifted (and eroded) topography and the corresponding paleoenvironmental reconstructions require reliable constrains. The Barents Shelf provides a unique arena to study uplift and erosion due to extensive seismic and well data attributed to high petroleum activity. This particular interest has led to a voluminous literature about this topic over the last three decades. Here, we present the current status of the Cenozoic uplift and erosion on the Norwegian Barents Shelf by reviewing the key terminology, its tectonic history and paleoenvironment, methods in quantifying uplift and erosion, as well as timing and possible mechanisms. Our new erosion maps show an increase in net erosion to the north and northeast that represents key underlying concepts, including tectonic (compression, rift-flank uplift, thermo-mechanical coupling, mantle dynamics, flexural/isostatic response) as well as magmatic and glacial processes. We have integrated pre-glacial and glacial net erosion using the mass balance method and added our results from sonic velocity, interval velocity and sandstone diagenesis methods to the new maps. This review shows that discrepancies of net erosion estimates from different methods are on the order of 500 m. Finally, we identify research gaps for future studies, with implications for the Barents Shelf and other uplifted basins worldwide.en_US
dc.identifier.citationLasabuda AL, Johansen N, Laberg JS, Faleide JI, Senger K, Rydningen TA, Patton H, Knutsen S, Hanssen A. Cenozoic uplift and erosion of the Norwegian Barents Shelf – A review. Earth-Science Reviews. 2021en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 1901527
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103609
dc.identifier.issn0012-8252
dc.identifier.issn1872-6828
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/21017
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.journalEarth-Science Reviews
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/RCN/SFF/223259/Norway/Centre for Arctic Gas Hydrate, Environment and Climate/CAGE/en_US
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/RCN/PETROSENTR/228107/Norway/Research Centre for Arctic Petroleum Exploration/ARCEx/en_US
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/RCN/SFF/223272/Norway/Centre for Earth Evolution and Dynamics/CEED/en_US
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2021 The Author(s)en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Mathematics and natural science: 400::Geosciences: 450::Tectonics: 463en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Geofag: 450::Tektonikk: 463en_US
dc.titleCenozoic uplift and erosion of the Norwegian Barents Shelf – A reviewen_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


File(s) in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record