ub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.muninLogoub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.openResearchArchiveLogo
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Velg spraakEnglish 
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Administration/UB
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for humaniora, samfunnsvitenskap og lærerutdanning
  • Institutt for språk og kultur
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (språk og kultur)
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for humaniora, samfunnsvitenskap og lærerutdanning
  • Institutt for språk og kultur
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (språk og kultur)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Ethiosemitic languages: Classifications and classification determinants

Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/21673
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2021.100074
Thumbnail
View/Open
article.pdf (8.618Mb)
Published version (PDF)
Date
2021-05-20
Type
Journal article
Tidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed

Author
Feleke, Tekabe Legesse
Abstract
The present study addresses three concerns: (1) presents the areal classification of Ethiosemitic languages; (2) identifies major determinants of the distance among the languages; (3) challenges previous genealogical classifications of Ethiosemitic languages. To address these objectives, cluster analyses were performed on randomly selected 147 word lists. Multidimensional scaling was employed for the cluster validation. The cluster analyses performed on the phonetic and lexical distance matrices show that Ethiosemitic languages can be classified into six major groups: {Chaha, Gura, Gumer, Ezha, Mesqan, Muher}, {Amharic, Argobba}, {Endegagn, Inor, Gyeto}, {Wolane, Silt'e, Zay}, {Dobbi, Kistane}, and {Ge'ez, Tigrigna, Tigre}. Harari has an unstable position that swings based on the type of classification parameter used. The areal classifications obtained from the analyses fairly match the genealogical classifications previously proposed by historical linguists, resulting in a significant degree of overlap between the areal and genealogical classifications. The study further examined selected linguistic and non-linguistic variables that underpin the distance among Ethiosemitic languages, using Multiple Linear Regression. The results of the regression analyses show that lexical diffusion among Ethiosemitic languages, geographical distance and diffusion of phonetic features from Oromo to the Ethiosemitic languages are the major determinants of the distance among Ethiosemitic languages.
Publisher
Elsevier
Citation
Feleke TL. Ethiosemitic languages: Classifications and classification determinants. Ampersand. 2021;8:1-15
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (språk og kultur) [1477]
Copyright 2021 The Author(s)

Browse

Browse all of MuninCommunities & CollectionsAuthor listTitlesBy Issue DateBrowse this CollectionAuthor listTitlesBy Issue Date
Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
UiT

Munin is powered by DSpace

UiT The Arctic University of Norway
The University Library
uit.no/ub - munin@ub.uit.no

Accessibility statement (Norwegian only)