ub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.muninLogoub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.openResearchArchiveLogo
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Velg spraakEnglish 
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Administration/UB
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Universitetsbiblioteket
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (UB)
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Universitetsbiblioteket
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (UB)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

eDNA metabarcoding for biodiversity assessment, generalist predators as sampling assistants

Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/22498
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85488-9
Thumbnail
View/Open
article.pdf (2.025Mb)
Published version (PDF)
Date
2021-03-25
Type
Journal article
Tidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed

Author
Nørgaard, Louise; Olesen, Carsten Riis; Trøjelsgaard, Kristian; Pertoldi, Cino; Nielsen, Jeppe Lund; Taberlet, Pierre Robert Michel; Ruiz-Gonzalez, Aritz; De Barba, M.; Iacolina, Laura
Abstract
With an accelerating negative impact of anthropogenic actions on natural ecosystems, non-invasive biodiversity assessments are becoming increasingly crucial. As a consequence, the interest in the application of environmental DNA (eDNA) survey techniques has increased. The use of eDNA extracted from faeces from generalist predators, have recently been described as “biodiversity capsules” and suggested as a complementary tool for improving current biodiversity assessments. In this study, using faecal samples from two generalist omnivore species, the Eurasian badger and the red fox, we evaluated the applicability of eDNA metabarcoding in determining dietary composition, compared to macroscopic diet identification techniques. Subsequently, we used the dietary information obtained to assess its contribution to biodiversity assessments. Compared to classic macroscopic techniques, we found that eDNA metabarcoding detected more taxa, at higher taxonomic resolution, and proved to be an important technique to verify the species identification of the predator from field collected faeces. Furthermore, we showed how dietary analyses complemented field observations in describing biodiversity by identifying consumed flora and fauna that went unnoticed during field observations. While diet analysis approaches could not substitute field observations entirely, we suggest that their integration with other methods might overcome intrinsic limitations of single techniques in future biodiversity surveys.
Publisher
Nature Research
Citation
Nørgaard, Olesen, Trøjelsgaard, Pertoldi, Nielsen, Taberlet PRM, Ruiz-Gonzalez, De Barba, Iacolina. eDNA metabarcoding for biodiversity assessment, generalist predators as sampling assistants. Scientific Reports. 2021;11(1)
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (UB) [3245]
Copyright 2021 The Author(s)

Browse

Browse all of MuninCommunities & CollectionsAuthor listTitlesBy Issue DateBrowse this CollectionAuthor listTitlesBy Issue Date
Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
UiT

Munin is powered by DSpace

UiT The Arctic University of Norway
The University Library
uit.no/ub - munin@ub.uit.no

Accessibility statement (Norwegian only)