ub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.muninLogoub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.openResearchArchiveLogo
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Velg spraakEnglish 
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Administration/UB
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for naturvitenskap og teknologi
  • Institutt for informatikk
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (informatikk)
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for naturvitenskap og teknologi
  • Institutt for informatikk
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (informatikk)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Safe Learning for Control using Control Lyapunov Functions and Control Barrier Functions: A Review

Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/23579
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.173
Thumbnail
View/Open
article.pdf (343.7Kb)
Published version (PDF)
Date
2021-10-01
Type
Journal article
Tidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed

Author
Sadanandan Anand, Akhil; Seel, Katrine; Gjærum, Vilde Benoni; Håkansson, Anne; Robinson, Haakon; Saad, Aya
Abstract
Real-world autonomous systems are often controlled using conventional model-based control methods. But if accurate models of a system are not available, these methods may be unsuitable. For many safety-critical systems, such as robotic systems, a model of the system and a control strategy may be learned using data. When applying learning to safety-critical systems, guaranteeing safety during learning as well as testing/deployment is paramount. A variety of different approaches for ensuring safety exists, but the published works are cluttered and there are few reviews that compare the latest approaches. This paper reviews two promising approaches on guaranteeing safety for learning-based robust control of uncertain dynamical systems, which are based on control barrier functions and control Lyapunov functions. While control barrier functions provide an option to incorporate safety in terms of constraint satisfaction, control Lyapunov functions are used to define safety in terms of stability. This review categorises learning-based methods that use control barrier functions and control Lyapunov functions into three groups, namely reinforcement learning, online and offline supervised learning. Finally, the paper presents a discussion of the suitability of the different methods for different applications.
Publisher
Elsevier
Citation
Sadanandan Anand A, Seel K, Gjærum V, Håkansson A, Robinson H, Saad A. Safe Learning for Control using Control Lyapunov Functions and Control Barrier Functions: A Review. Procedia Computer Science. 2021;192:3987-3997
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (informatikk) [481]
Copyright 2021 The Author(s)

Related items

Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

  • Thumbnail

    The effect of metacognitive executive function training on children's executive function, proactive control, and academic skills 

    Kubota, Maki; Hadley, Lauren V.; Schaeffner, Simone; Könen, Tanja; Meaney, Julie-Anne; Morey, Candice C.; Auyeung, Bonnie; Moriguchi, Yusuke; Karbach, Julia; Chevalier, Nicolas (Journal article; Tidsskriftartikkel; Peer reviewed, 2023)
    The current study investigated the effects of metacognitive and executive function (EF) training on childhood EF (inhibition, working memory [WM], cognitive flexibility, and proactive/reactive control) and academic skills (reading, reasoning, and math) among children from disadvantaged backgrounds. Children (N = 134, Mage = 8.70 years) were assigned randomly to the three training groups: (a) ...
  • Thumbnail

    Form follows function: pragmatic controlled trials (PCTs) have to answer different questions and require different designs than randomized controlled trials (RCTs) 

    Porzsolt, Franz; Wyers, Peter; Eisemann, Martin; Habs, Michael (Journal article; Tidsskriftartikkel; Peer reviewed, 2012)
    Rising concern for demonstrated real world comparative effectiveness has heightened interest in “pragmatic trials” design. Pragmatic trials investigate whether the efficacy, presumed or found in explanatory trials under ideal conditions, can also be detected under real world conditions, i.e. effectiveness. It is also recognized that ‘real world’ effects which are usually addressed in public health ...
  • Thumbnail

    Form follows function: pragmatic controlled trials (PCTs) have to answer different questions and require different designs than randomized controlled trials (RCTs). 

    Porzsolt, Franz; Eisemann, Martin; Habs, Michael; Wyer, Peter (Journal article; Tidsskriftartikkel; Peer reviewed, 2013)
    Aim Rising concern for demonstrated real world comparative effectiveness has heightened interest in “pragmatic trials” design. Pragmatic trials investigate whether the efficacy, presumed or found in explanatory trials under ideal conditions, can also be detected under real world conditions, i.e. effectiveness. It is also recognized that ‘real world’ effects which are usually addressed in public ...

Browse

Browse all of MuninCommunities & CollectionsAuthor listTitlesBy Issue DateBrowse this CollectionAuthor listTitlesBy Issue Date
Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
UiT

Munin is powered by DSpace

UiT The Arctic University of Norway
The University Library
uit.no/ub - munin@ub.uit.no

Accessibility statement (Norwegian only)