ub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.muninLogoub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.openResearchArchiveLogo
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Velg spraakEnglish 
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Administration/UB
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for humaniora, samfunnsvitenskap og lærerutdanning
  • Institutt for språk og kultur
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (språk og kultur)
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for humaniora, samfunnsvitenskap og lærerutdanning
  • Institutt for språk og kultur
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (språk og kultur)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

"A Discussion on Document Conceptualization,"

Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/23740
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35492/docam/3/2/1
Thumbnail
View/Open
article.pdf (333.9Kb)
Published version (PDF)
Date
2016
Type
Journal article
Tidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed

Author
Lund, Niels Windfeld; Gorichanaz, Tim; Latham, Kiersten F.
Abstract
The authors discuss two conceptual frameworks of documents and documentation: Lund's complementarity theory of documentation; and Gorichanaz and Latham's framework of document phenomenology. The role of documentation in conceptualizing the document is discussed, and the notions of documentation and documental becoming are compared. Through the discussion, clarity is gained regarding both methods of conceptualization.
Publisher
The University of Akron
Citation
Lund NW, Gorichanaz, Latham KF. "A Discussion on Document Conceptualization,". Proceedings from the Document Academy (PDOCAM). 2016;3(2)
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (språk og kultur) [1472]
Copyright 2016 The Author(s)

Browse

Browse all of MuninCommunities & CollectionsAuthor listTitlesBy Issue DateBrowse this CollectionAuthor listTitlesBy Issue Date
Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
UiT

Munin is powered by DSpace

UiT The Arctic University of Norway
The University Library
uit.no/ub - munin@ub.uit.no

Accessibility statement (Norwegian only)