Do we choose differently after a discussion? Results from a deliberative valuation study in Ireland
Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/24395Date
2021Type
Journal articleTidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed
Abstract
A criticism against individual-based stated preference surveys is that people seldom make choices in social isolation. An approach used in response to this is deliberative valuation. We conduct a series of valuation workshops including a choice experiment. This involves providing respondents with information and opportunity to discuss. They made their choices individually both before and after the discussion. On average respondents stated different preferences after the discussion compared to before, and the stated preferences became more consistent after deliberation. Unexpectedly, persons stating high certainty of pre-deliberation choices changed stated preferences more after deliberation than persons stating lower certainty of choices.
Description
Reprinted courtesy of the University of Wisconsin Press.
Related research data
Aanesen, Margrethe, 2019, "Replication data for: Do we choose differently after a discussion?", https://doi.org/10.18710/XG6CYW, DataverseNO, V2Publisher
University of Wisconsin PressCitation
Aanesen, M., Armstrong, C. & Van Rensburg, T.M. (2021). Do we choose differently after a discussion? Results from a deliberative valuation study in Ireland. Land Economics, 97(1), 207-223.Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Copyright 2021 by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System