dc.description.abstract | This article seeks to challenge what may seem to be an obvious assertion: that finitude is original
in the sense that it must be presupposed that any possible meaning can only be thought beginning from this
finitude. I do this through a rereading of Derrida’s epochal essay “Violence and Metaphysics,” which
perhaps is the most decisive interpretation of the philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas. In the essay, Derrida
demonstrates how Levinas is forced to betray his own intentions in his attempt to describe the Other as
transcendent. By making use of a newly published lecture series, Derrida held at the same time as writing
the essay, I show how Derrida’s reading of Levinas is intimately tied to his interpretation of Heidegger’s
critique of the metaphysics of presence, and how both Levinas and Derrida end up in the paradox I call
“original finitude.” I then show how new commentary literature on Levinas’ analysis of enjoyment gives us
an alternative to Derrida’s notion of original finitude. I do not propose that this alternative overcomes
Derrida’s problematic, but rather that it gives another option of how to relate to that which escapes the
grasp of philosophy. The key difference will be whether transcendence is conceived as a failure of philosophy or its excess. | en_US |