Patient and public involvement in health research from researchers' perspective
Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/30736Date
2023-08-21Type
Journal articleTidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed
Author
Røssvoll, Toril Beate; Rosenvinge, Jan H; Liabø, Kristin; Hanssen, Tove Aminda; Pettersen, GunnAbstract
Method: Semi‐structured individual interviews were conducted online with nine Norwegian researchers. The interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Results: Professional background and clinical experience from person‐centred OT formed the foundation for how these researchers approached and facilitated PPI in their research. Valuing experiential knowledge and facilitating PPI to be meaningful for public collaborators were highlighted as essential for PPI to have an impact. The need to balance mutual expectations, requirements for research, and what might be possible to achieve within a research study were found to be vital.
Conclusion: Collaborative clinical experience constituted a sound foundation for implementing PPI in research. The occupational perspective underlines the importance of acknowledging experiential knowledge as essential to facilitating meaningful PPI. Challenges related to requirements for research and culture for implementing PPI were addressed by clarifying roles and expectations.
Patient or Public Contribution: Three public collaborators were involved in developing the aims, the interview guide, and the data analysis. They all had previous experience being involved in research.