Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKrämer, Martin
dc.contributor.authorVogt, Barbara
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-18T13:07:24Z
dc.date.available2023-09-18T13:07:24Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-30
dc.description.abstractThis paper contributes to the discussion around the (extra-)grammatical status of language games (or ludlings). We collected over 60 games which are based on the affixation of a dummy morpheme, which is infixed and iterated in most cases. While some are obviously reduplicative, closer investigation reveals that all the games involving iterativity function like reduplication. Our optimality-theoretic analysis concentrates on the explanation of shape, segmental content, placement and iterativity of the dummy affix and employs only constraints standardly assumed in the literature on reduplication. We show that no ludling-specific constraints or stipulations are necessary to account for this typology and make predictions on limitations that presumably apply to typological variation with regard to language games. Ludlings are thus variations of grammatical constraint rankings.en_US
dc.identifier.citationKrämer M, Vogt B. Alignment and locality in the typology of affixing language games. The Linguistic Review. 2018;35(1):83-120en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 1603590
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/tlr-2017-0018
dc.identifier.issn0167-6318
dc.identifier.issn1613-3676
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/31082
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherDe Gruyteren_US
dc.relation.journalThe Linguistic Review
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Bostonen_US
dc.titleAlignment and locality in the typology of affixing language gamesen_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


File(s) in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record