How ready is the health care system in Northeast India for surgical delivery? A mixed-methods study on surgical capacity and need
Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/35054Date
2024-06-26Type
Journal articleTidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed
Author
Virk, Amrit; King, Rebecca; Heneise, Michael Timothy; Aier, Lanuakum; Child, Catriona; Brown, Julia; Ensor, TimAbstract
Aim and method This mixed-methods study examines the state of surgical care in Northeast India, specifically health care system capacity and barriers to surgical delivery. It involved a facilitybased census and semi-structured interviews with surgeons and patients across four states in the region.
Results Abdominal conditions constituted a large portion of the overall surgeries across public and private facilities in the region. Workloads varied among surgical providers across facilities. Task-shifting occurred, involving non-specialist nursing staff assisting doctors with surgical procedures or surgeons taking on anaesthetic tasks. Structural factors dis-incentivised facility-level investment in suitable infrastructure. Facility functionality was on average higher in private providers compared to public providers and private facilities offer a wider range of surgical procedures. Facilities in general had adequate laboratory testing capability, infrastructure and equipment. Public facilities often do not have surgeon available around the clock while both public and private facilities frequently lack adequate blood banking. Patients’ care pathways were shaped by facility-level shortages as well as personal preferences influenced by cost and distance to facilities.
Discussion and conclusion Skewed workloads across facilities and regions indicate uneven surgical delivery, with potentially variable care quality and provider efficiency. The need for a more system-wide and inter-linked approach to referral coordination and human resource management is evident in the results. Existing task-shifting practices, along with incapacities induced by structural factors, signal the directions for possible policy action.