Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBjerklund, Hedda Smedheim
dc.contributor.authorAntonsen, Trine
dc.contributor.authorMyhr, Anne Ingeborg
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-25T08:57:12Z
dc.date.available2024-10-25T08:57:12Z
dc.date.issued2024-09-03
dc.description.abstractOver the past ten years, the concept of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) has gained visibility, both in policy context as well as within academic discussions concerning science and technology. Research funding bodies in Norway do now include RRI as a requirement in calls for funding, especially in emerging technologies projects. However, the concept of RRI has been criticized for its unclarity in how the idea of RRI should or could be interpreted practically. Here we present our experiences of using the Research Ethics cards as an RRI approach to help researchers and research participants to enhance reflexivity regarding the effects and potential impacts of research. Our task was to apply RRI concepts to guide the development of the projects methodological approach for the study on nanoand microplastics in marine animals, e.g. salmon, to identify and reflect on the ethical aspects of their research. The methodological approach utilized in the project includes for example novel technologies such as advanced microscopy and modern gene technologies as -omics approaches. By using the Research Ethics cards in applying the RRI concepts, we found that the RRI facilitator can decide what role one wish to take, and it provides a common conceptual understanding prior to discussion. This approach allowed for open discussions and circumvented the challenge that employing RRI in technology projects become a one-way discussion and that the RRI facilitator owns the questions and the answer. Yet, common to other work on reflexivity, this methodology was not suited to address power asymmetries within the research group. We suggest that adding cards addressing the social situatedness can contribute to building awareness about potential power asymmetries in a research group. This may facilitate that all viewpoints become a part of the knowledge production and help researchers and research participants to reflect on ethical responsibilities in research and innovation projects.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBjerklund, Antonsen, Myhr: The use of the Research Ethics cards for enhancing reflexivity: Case study on detection of microplastics in salmon. In: Giersberg, Bovenkerk, Meijboom. Back to the future: Sustainable innovations for ethical food production and consumption, 2024. Wageningen Academic Publishers p. 454-459en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 2299288
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1163/9789004715509_003
dc.identifier.isbn9789004715509
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/35336
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBrillen_US
dc.relation.projectIDNorges forskningsråd: 301401en_US
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2024 The Author(s)en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)en_US
dc.titleThe use of the Research Ethics cards for enhancing reflexivity: Case study on detection of microplastics in salmonen_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeChapteren_US
dc.typeBokkapittelen_US


File(s) in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)