Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZylberberg, Tomás
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Ricardo
dc.contributor.authorPettersen, Svein Arne
dc.contributor.authorAfonso, José
dc.contributor.authorMatias Do Vale Baptista, Ivan Andre
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-15T11:29:44Z
dc.date.available2024-11-15T11:29:44Z
dc.date.issued2024-11-12
dc.description.abstractObjectives To evaluate the acute effect of exposure to a potentiation warm-up protocol compared to a usual warm-up program. <p>Design Randomized parallel control trial. <p>Setting Synthetic grass in the club’s facilities (Portugal). Participants Seventeen female football players (age: 23.9±3.9 years), were randomly allocated to a control (n=8) and an experimental group (n=9). To allocate the players, a table was computer-generated by a research team member with no involvement in the trial. Intervention The control group performed their usual warm-up program, while the experimental group performed a potentiation warm-up protocol with jumps combined with sprints with change of direction. <p>Main outcomes measures The players were tested pre- and post-intervention for a 40-m linear sprint and preplanned change of direction using the T-test. <p>Statistical analysis An intention-to-treat analysis was performed, with all the participants originally randomized being involved. The normal distribution was verified by the Shapiro-Wilk test. The assumption of sphericity was analyzed. Effect sizes were calculated using partial eta squared. <p>Results No significant pre-post differences in the T-test and in the 40-m sprint were detected for any group. However, in the T-test, large effect sizes in time increments were observed within the experimental (0.27 s; p>0.05, ηp <sup>2</sup>=0.176) and control groups (0.06 s; p>0.05, η<sub>p</sub> <sup>2</sup>=0.176). Also, in the 40-m sprint, large effect sizes in time increments were observed within the experimental (0.05 s; p>0.05, η<sub>p</sub> <sup>2</sup>=0.251) and control groups (0.09 s; p>0.05, η<sub>p</sub> <sup>2</sup>=0.251). <p>Conclusions The performance-enhancing ability of the potentiation method performed at warm-up was not verified when applied to female football players. Thus, the potentiation methods may not improve sprint and COD ability for this population. However, the lack of statistical significance may have been due to reduced statistical power, as three of four effects suggest acute performance impairment after a supposed potentiation-oriented warm-up. Nevertheless, the presence of a statistical type 2 error cannot be ruled out.en_US
dc.identifier.citationZylberberg, Martins, Pettersen, Afonso, Matias Do Vale Baptista. Acute responses to a potentiation warm-up protocol on sprint and change of direction in female football players: a randomized controlled study. BMC sports science, medicine and rehabilitation. 2024en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 2320661
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13102-024-01015-z
dc.identifier.issn2052-1847
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/35730
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.relation.journalBMC sports science, medicine and rehabilitation
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2024 The Author(s)en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)en_US
dc.titleAcute responses to a potentiation warm-up protocol on sprint and change of direction in female football players: a randomized controlled studyen_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


File(s) in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)