Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorFøllesdal, Andreas
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-16T10:27:43Z
dc.date.available2025-04-16T10:27:43Z
dc.date.issued2025-02-20
dc.description.abstract'Subsidiarity' is vague and contested, yet popular in scholarship about international law due to its role in the European Union (EU). Which conceptions of subsidiarity are more justifiable, and how might they contribute to international law? A principle of subsidiarity concerns how to establish, allocate, or use authority within a social or legal order, stating a rebuttable presumption for the local. Various historical patterns, practices, principles, and justifications offer different recommendations. Seven normative theories vary in how immunity protecting or person promoting they are. The latter appear more justifiable and withstand criticism often raised against subsidiarity. Some conceptions of person promoting subsidiarity serve as a structuring principle for international law and fullfills several criteria of a general principle of law. It can harmonize domestic and international law but is not sufficient to reduce fragmentation among sectors with different objectives.en_US
dc.identifier.citationFøllesdal. Subsidiarity. Cambridge University Press; 2025. Elements in Philosophy of Lawen_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 2361027
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/9781108993685
dc.identifier.isbn9781108993685
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/36910
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherCambrigde University Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesElements in Philosophy of Lawen_US
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2025 The Author(s)en_US
dc.titleSubsidiarityen_US
dc.type.versionsubmittedVersionen_US
dc.typeBooken_US
dc.typeBoken_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel